User talk:Fellow3

Possible conflict of interest
Hello, Fellow3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Audrey Mullender, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Johnnie Bob. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Audrey Mullender. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Audrey Mullender. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Audrey Mullender. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Biographies of living persons discussion
There is currently a discussion at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard regarding an incident with which you may be involved. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia can actually be a friendly, helpful place
The Mullender article has now been modified to a much more balanced description of events about the record destruction, so your apparent goal has been accomplished and I'm guessing you are done editing. If not though, I'd like to say that your goal could have been realized days ago with far less effort and conflict if you had simply listened to the other editors and engaged them in discussion. This site can actually be really great when people come with a collaborative attitude instead of trying to bulldoze through.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 20:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)