User talk:Felterma

Speedy deletion of Ivy Bannister
A tag has been placed on Ivy Bannister, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. --Rrburke(talk) 15:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mary Rose Callaghan
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mary Rose Callaghan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article was originally copied verbatim from a book of essays, by the essay's author, which means it is problematic on several levels:


 * Possible copyright infringement (often the publisher, not the author, owns the copyright)
 * Conflict of interest (author publishing their own work to Wikipedia)
 * NPOV (author overly enthusiastic about their subject)

NPOV issues can be easily edited out. The other two are more thorny and IMHO can't be easily resolved without a complete rewrite by a disinterested party. Given that even the author's notability is debatable, I'm suspicious that it's worth the effort.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tim Pierce (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)