User talk:Felviper

July 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Now you see why we use edit summaries

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Acid throwing page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=693392204 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F693392204%7CAcid throwing%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Central Bloc of the FARC-EP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Central_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Central_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Huila and Cauca
 * Eastern Bloc of the FARC-EP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eastern_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eastern_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Casanare

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

FIFA Statistical Kit
Hey Felviper! Since the FIFA World Cup knockout stages are starting tomorrow, can you please help me to get the link of the statistical kit for the matches, similar to the document which you retrieved for the group stages. Thanks in advance..!!--Anbans 585 (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hey Felviper! Thanks for helping me the other day. I wanted to discuss about this edit. I think that we should only mention the Confedration Cup and Continental Championships if the two teams don't have a World Cup history between them. I think that if we write about all the extra details then the short summary will look a bit more extended and will look like something irrelevant to the world cup.

I think that we should use the following priority level-
 * If world cup history exists, then only mention it, else go to next step.
 * If qualifiers history exists, then only mention it, else go to next step.
 * If Confedration Cup history exists, then only mention it, else go to next step.
 * If Continental history exists, then only mention it, else go to next step.
 * If none of the above conditions meet, mention the match they last played in, usually a friendly or a match in a friendly tournament.

Do tell me about your say on this matter, and then we can make the edits likewise.--Anbans 585 (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Spain and Morocco issue
Hi, about my reverted edit, personally I am unwilling to add geographical details there. You also edit football articles frequently, so I think you would understand that geography is quite unrelated to international football. Simply, Spain and Morocco are affiliated with different confederations. Just think about how many matches Panama have played against Colombia (actually there have been quite a few, about 10), Guyana against Venezuela, Suriname against Brazil, Turkey against Iran/Iraq/Syria, Iran against Azerbaijan, Russia against China/Mongolia/North Korea, Kazakhstan against China/Kyrgyzstan/Turkmenistan/Uzbekistan (especially since they joined UEFA), and Israel... (just kidding ^^ I know you do not refer to Israel in your argument, for good reasons). Spain-Morocco discord (e.g. Ceuta, Melilla, Western Sahara) has something to do as well. Centaur271188 (talk) 07:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Lion Air Flight 610
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lion Air Flight 610; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Naming aviation accident victims in articles
Has been discussed multiple times in the last six months. Please read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamJE (talk • contribs)
 * Here- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Northwest_Airlines_Flight_255#Should_Cecelia_Cichan_be_mentioned_by_name?
 * Here- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1943_Gibraltar_B-24_crash#Question
 * And how about a little over a month ago- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Galaxy_Airlines_Flight_203
 * And how about last week- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation/Aviation_accident_task_force#Here_we_go_again-_Munich_air_disaster

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)