User talk:Female bodybuilder enthusiast


 * Do not accuse me of lying. You have admitted to being a sock-puupet of AHC300, who is currently blocked. Therefore this is simply block evasion. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 20:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You do not even know the history of me. This account was ACCUSED FALSELY of being a sock puppet originally. So what are you saying? Stay banned forever? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Nomination of Twisted Sisters (2010 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twisted Sisters (2010 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Twisted Sisters (2010 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 01:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 45084
is now open. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Per UTRS, will have TPA restored for appeal to WP:AN. Will likely need WP:TBAN on zoophilia, broadly construed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Female bodybuilder enthusiast, you are expected to follow the steps given in WP:UNBAN, taking into account Deepfriedokra's advice above. --Yamla (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok I will comply fully with your directives. Is there anything else I need to do? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, you need to make the specific request which will be carried over to the noticeboard, as per WP:UNBAN. --Yamla (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Question, how exactly do I do this again? Do I just make a new section on my talk page unblock requesting this? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Are you sure this is what you want your unblock request to be? Because I will reject it. Instead of declining your unblock request I am going to give you another chance. You need to follow the instructions given to you. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 12:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not 100% sure what to do next. I went to WP:UNBAN. It says "Post an appeal unblock template or comment there, by email or other off-site means such as the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS), and ask for it to be reposted to the appropriate discussion board. This is a voluntary act and should not be abused or used to excess." So you want my reason for my unblock in the unblock template changed, correct? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 13:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to address your abusive sockpuppetry after your initial block. You'll want to note that you've gone six months without block evasion (note: this will be validated) and are therefore applying under WP:SO. You'll want to note that the original block was inappropriate and the overlap between the two accounts was coincidental (but that the subsequent blocks were appropriate). You'll want to note that you are willing to abide by a topic ban around zoophilia, broadly construed (or alternatively, are unwilling to accept such a topic ban), and that you'll stick to a single account going forward. Basically, assume anyone reading your request has zero context and doesn't have access to your UTRS request. --Yamla (talk) 13:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

For the record, checkuser evidence shows no recent block evasion. This will count in favour of the eventual unban request. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

I guess we need an unblock request template. Just fill it all in the Your reason here section. Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in the. "Your reason here ". I think you largely need to put what you already said at UTRS, formatting as Yamla suggests. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 14:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

I have decided to take this request to the community at large. I will be posting it at Administrators' noticeboard. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 22:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your request is being considered here: Administrators' noticeboard. If you have anything to add you can post here and me or another user will post it there. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 23:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I plan on editing mostly female bodybuilding content, history, and election topics. Mostly fbb as I've been away from editing. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Female bodybuilder enthusiast, sorry that your unblock request at AN was not accepted at this time. Would have loved to see you return to editing. Best, — Nnadigoodluck  █ █ █ 03:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * What do I do now? And I'm still being cited as being Latitude011. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No. The discussion noted that you were not cu-confirmed to Latitude0116 at that time. The main reason you were not unblocked is because most editors that commented including sysops were concerned that you used multiple accounts to evade a block for a very long time. I'll advise you to resume editing another language Wikipedia with your main account and come back after like six months with a good demonstrable track record, IMHO, your block might be lifted. Best, — Nnadigoodluck  █ █ █ 23:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hooked: Muscle Women


The article Hooked: Muscle Women has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Found only TV Guide listings on ProQuest and newspapers.com. No results on GNews. Regular Google search yielded only uploads and directory listings."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)