User talk:Fembotic

March 2017
Hello, I'm Tompop888. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Frank Rizzo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Rizzo. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Frank Rizzo was changed by Fembotic (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870914 on 2017-03-18T23:43:57+00:00.

February 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Coconut oil. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ''Review WP:MEDRS. You need that quality of sourcing to make major changes in message. '' Zefr (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)