User talk:Femwar

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Alexf(talk) 15:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

hi
just to let you know.. that IP is bluffing. there's no report @ admin's vandalism-page. Seb az86556 (talk) 07:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Before anyone can report you for vandalism, you must have been given vandalism warnings, level 1, 2, 3, and 4 on this (your user-) page. There are specific templates for it. (For example, what you received above this one is the 3-revert warning. That one you get only once before getting blocked). So as long as no-one has sufficiently warned you, everything's cool. Once you see this [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] or something like it on your page, it's time to pay attention.
 * I can't show you what the other warnings look like 'cause if I put them here, the system will think you have done something wrong. Seb az86556 (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That is ok. I get the idea :) Femwar (talk) 08:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Women's rights in Iran
Could you take a look at Women's rights in Iran? A delusional editor has come back and deleted that section which you restored.  Azure Fury  (talk | contribs) 07:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)