User talk:Fenderesquire

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Social neuroscience, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Social neuroscience was changed by Fenderesquire (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95153 on 2011-02-04T22:51:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Social neuroscience. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If you object to something in the article, you should either fix the article or add a section to Talk:Social neuroscience, the article's "talk" page, explaining the problem. Putting comments into the article itself just makes it a mess for readers.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)