User talk:Fenice

SCOTW
Hi Fenice,

You'll find that I've taken over Science Collaboration of the Week, which you seemed to be running, for the time being. Give me a nod when you come back! - Samsara contrib talk 10:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

AID
Same thing with AID here. It'd be great if you returned just to help us maintain the stuff, you don't have to edit nothing ;-) --Dijxtra 12:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Bye
May your Wikipedia user account rest in peace. haz (user talk) 19:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Edit warring
Just to leave a note that the user page should say "edit warring with violetriga", as Fenice is the one that went against consensus and I merely undid the mistaken edits. violet/riga (t) 20:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Why don't you save it for LiveJournal, Violetrag. I know it's old news, but editing a dead user's page knowing they're gone and won't respond is underhanded and cowardly.  Fenice was a cool girl, and you should be ashamed for using edits as an excuse to drive her away.  Every breath you take is a sin.  FeniceFan 21:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * And leaving a psuedo personal attack against another user as your parting shot is the height of good conduct. violet/riga (t) 22:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Anymore and an admin will have to deal with this --DragonWR12LB 18:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Continued anonymous vandalization after retirement?
I have noticed some recent vandalization of blatant deletion which reminded me of past vandalization of blatant deletion. I have warned the IP address who made the changes, and suggested the link to here, as well as on the talk page of Electra complex. I am interested in what those who have had edit wars with this person have to add to this suspicion --Tyciol 08:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Did Fenice not give reasons for her edits? If so, is it proper to call it vandalism? -- Steven 22:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * A reason was given, but it was a blatant deletion rather than talking it over to resolve inconsistancies. I was called out on it and I admit, using vandalization was a bad term, I've learned from that to try and amend my wikiquette so as to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially when they do state part of a reason. Even so, if this was Fenice (I don't know, it might be someone entirely different), then it would lower my opinion. As I see it, Fenice wasn't a vandal, but did make the changes too blatantly, while ignoring the fact that much of the rest of the article is similarly unsourced. It's not been semi-sourced anyway. Tyciol 06:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Page name for temperature articles
To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Protein purification is Science Collab of the Week
Samsara contrib talk 00:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Hydrosphere is Science Collaboration
Please also spread the word about, and vote for, next week's collaboration, as we have a three-way tie at two votes each!

User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

SCOTW: Chronospecies finally makes it!
These are the comments on the nomination, which may be helpful in improving the article:
 * Lots of potential for this little article like examples, causes, and general elaboration. Neum 04:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * A great fact to include would be the shortest time over which speciation of a sexual organism is known to have occurred. &mdash;James S. 21:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

In other news:
 * SCOTW needs a new maintainer, and could to with a maintenance bot. If you know of anybody who may be interested in either task, please let them know!
 * It took me a while, but I've learnt how to use these templates now!

User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Latin America won!
Joyous | Talk 18:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week
User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Biopharmaceutical is the Science Collaboration of the Week
User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

SCOTM
Since you haven't edited since January, I"m removing you from this list. Feel free to rejoin if you come back. pschemp | talk 03:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CineVoter
A tag has been placed on Template:CineVoter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia
Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who participate in the European Union collaboration
Category:Wikipedians who participate in the European Union collaboration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCOTMvoter
Template:SCOTMvoter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Directive Communication Psychology


A tag has been placed on Directive Communication Psychology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)