User talk:Fenric

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The Master and Survival already existed. Still, thanks for contributing to wikipedia. You might be interested in WikiProject Doctor Who as you have shown interest in the programme. Tim | meep in my general direction 20:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Doctor Who episode pages
Hi! Thanks for adding info to the pages for upcoming Doctor Who episodes. Unfortunately, some of what you added hasn't been officially confirmed or reported by a reliable source. We can't put speculation about what might be in an upcoming episode here — no matter how reasonable it may seem based on things we do know. All we can do is put the evidence (from newspaper reports and reliable fan sites like Outpost Gallifrey) on the page and allow readers to draw their own conclusions. I hope you understand, and please continue to help improve our Doctor Who pages! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Bill Wynne's Doctor Who
…has been moved onto your user page. Please do not recreate this in the main body of the encyclopaedia. Tim | meep in my general direction 23:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Adding Images to my articles
Can anybody help me download images from Doctor Who to my edited webpages?

Doctor who untelevised Season 27
Doctor who untelevised Season 27 is now being discussed for deletion at Articles for deletion/Doctor who untelevised Season 27. Please contribute to the discussion there. Do also make sure not to remove this new different deletion notice which is needed to point people to the discussion. NickelShoe 04:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Deleting Doctor who untelevised season 27
I wrote this article as a brief page for anyone who wondered what would have happened. I understand it is very short, please consider putting it on an episode guide page of Doctor Who and please note that I have deeper research to be done on this article.

Thanks, hope you reply, Fenric.

Doctor Who pictures
We appreciate you trying to add pictures to the various articles, but they need to be both laid out properly and in the right format. Take a look at the style guidelines in the Wikiproject page. Basically, we only should have one screencap per page to stay firmly within fair use conditions, and the screen captures for the new series should be 350px wide and in the right place.

In the process, I also reverted stuff that isn't confirmed yet but speculation or rumour (no matter how strong), as Josiah did previously. Hope you understand this. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 19:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Bill Wynne's Doctor Who
I'm sorry to tell you that your articles on the fan-produced Doctor Who series have been deleted as they do not meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. Fan productions aren't usually major enough to be considered deserving of their own articles. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:40, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Android.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Android.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 07:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Krillitane.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krillitane.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DOCTOR_WHO.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:DOCTOR_WHO.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:The_Destroyer.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The_Destroyer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Doctor_Who.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doctor_Who.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Billdoctorwhocostume.jpg
Hi. When you uploaded Image:Billdoctorwhocostume.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with GFDL-presumed and for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image, and that, just as with all of your text contributions, you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually GFDL-self or PD-self. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can be of assistance or leave a message at Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. MER-C 13:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Billdoctorwhocostume.jpg
Hi. When you uploaded Image:Billdoctorwhocostume.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with GFDL-presumed and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually GFDL-self or PD-self. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 21:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Fenric! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Keff McCulloch -