User talk:Fenwayrecordings

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 18:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fenway recordings
I've added the "prod" template to the article Fenway recordings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Fenway recordings. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 18:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The main concern I have with the page is the fact that you clearly have a vested interest in the company, given your user name. Please read WP:VAIN and WP:AUTO for more information.
 * I appreciate your level-headedness about this...a lot of new users get grumpy when their articles are nominated for deletion. I agree that you are making good faith attempts to create the article for your company, but as is stated in Wikipedia Guidelines for Vanity Articles:
 * "While an article about a little-known company, say, should not automatically be taken as a vanity article, it is preferable for the initial author not to be an owner, employee of, or investor in the company; likewise, an article about a little-known musician or band should preferably not be by the musician, a member, or a manager, roadie, groupie, etc."
 * and in Wikipedia Guidelines for Autobiographies:
 * You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 20:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I cleaned this up, take a look and let me know what you think! If you have more links to articles about Kates or Fenway, let me know... or better yet, cite them in the article! PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 22:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Unbusted
I cleaned up your article and cited sources. As much as Wikipedians like to assume good faith, they do require reliable sources to information in their articles. If I hadn't done a search on the band, I might have thought the article was a hoax. I also took out the superfluous and unverifiable information provided in the article, which was a dead giveaway that this was a vanity undertaking. I'm sure there are plenty of such articles that have turned into great articles, but I might suggest that when you write future contributions, keep these things in mind. Pretend you don't like the band and are being forced to write about them. ;) Put in only facts that you can back up with sources, and don't say anything nice or mean about the subject. PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 21:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, these changes look great. Now that more people are contributing to these articles will they get untagged for deletion?  Fenwayrecordings 15:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. What you need is reliable and notable sources independent from the article's subject (i.e. relevant press coverage). PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 21:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Fenway Recordings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fenway Recordings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fenway Recordings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem 07:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)