User talk:Fenyard

January 2020
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of roller coaster rankings, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you believe you have a valid citation, let's discuss on the article's talk page. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources if you need help. Also see Wikipedia's core policy on verifiability. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * So it appears you have restored your edit that I reverted, despite the fact that it lacks verifiability. The content should remain out of the article until a valid source is found, not the other way around. When you are challenged, the onus to justify inclusion in on you, and so far that hasn't happened. In the spirit of WP:BRD, I suggest you undo your edit and avoid getting yourself into an edit war which can lead to a block. I've addressed this in more detail on the article's talk page. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry about re-editing but I didn't knew how to respond, so I used the edit to try to answer to you. About the drop lenght I think we can agree it's almost as tall as the height of the ride. Even though there is no clear source about the length of the drop it should be in the list since it's completely pointless to not add this ride to the longest drop list. I propose to let it on the list with 367ft/112m with a note asking to see if someone has the real number or can calculate it.
 * Also as you can see on pictures of the ride, the lowest point of the ride is way below the launch section so it may be greater than 112m but not smaller.
 * This is another reason of why it needs to be in this list -- Fenyard (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I understand where you're coming from, but unfortunately our policies and guidelines here on Wikipedia prevent us from making the claim. We only reflect what is published in reliable sources. This is explained in more detail at the links I provided you in the previous posts above. I encourage you to read through them. For us to judge an approximate height would be considered original research, and that is strictly prohibited. I've changed it to "unknown" for now and left it in the list, but further discussion should be conducted on the article's talk page. If you're new here and need assistance with editing, then visit the Teahouse where you ask questions and seek guidance. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)