User talk:FeralOink/Archive 3

You've got mail
EpochFail (talk &bull; contribs) 13:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

A bit more help with Accenture?
Hey again, FeralOink! I recently posted a couple more changes that I'd like to see made to the Accenture article over at Talk:Accenture, and an editor named Gigs weighed in, but did not seem to think that most of the changes should be made. If you have time, would you be willing to take a look and provide a third opinion? Curious on your thoughts. Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 16:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey FeralOink, in case you hadn't seen, Stalwart has weighed in over at Talk:Accenture and I agree with the solution he suggests for Principal subsidiaries, which is very similar to one of the options you suggested. Do you want to take a look and see if that sounds ok to you? Also, he offered some thoughts on the wording regarding Tiger Woods, if you'd like to take a look at that too. ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 13:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey again FeralOink, not sure if you saw, but I followed up over at Talk:Accenture—it looks like you, Stalwart111, and I are all in agreement about how to move forward with the Principal subsidiaries section—hurray! Do you think you could go ahead and make that edit? We also still haven't figured out what to call Tiger Woods, so if you have additional thoughts there, I'd appreciate it. Thanks again for your help on this article! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 16:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi again, sorry to bug you, but I was hoping you might be willing to pop back over to Accenture and go ahead and implement the change about the Principal subsidiaries section that you and Stalwart111 agree about? Since there's consensus on it, it seems like it should be straightforward. Also, any idea what to do about the Tiger Woods issue? It seems things are a bit stuck with the disagreement there, so I'm not sure how best to move forward. Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 14:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This is also ✅ ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 12:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WinCo Foods
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:WinCo Foods. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 01:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Have you considered a RfA?
Seems to me you've got the right chops for an admin, if you think you're ready. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  14:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Think Tank 30
FeralOink, in response to: your message; Hi, sorry, it takes me a bit to get on here and respond lately. As for the license's for screenshot's and/or self-created images, I am unsure any more. I was very keen on all of the copyright policies at one time, but they have changed quite a bit since. I apologize for not being of more help on the matter. Thank you for the comment and the additional info you provided, it was enlightening. &laquo;&raquo;Who?&iquest;? 04:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. -- Mdann 52   talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teagle Foundation RESUBMITTED
When you have a moment, I'd greatly appreciate if you can take a look at the resubmitted page. I incorporated more information about grantees and individual Foundation events, in hopes this will increase chances of submission. Your feedback is much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desv2012 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ludwig von Mises Institute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ludwig von Mises Institute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:TheBus (Honolulu)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:TheBus (Honolulu). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582659888 your edit] to Bruce S. Raynor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * pension and insurance funds. He was Chairman of the Board of Amalgamated Life Insurance Company, a union-affiliated insurance company established in 1943. As Chairman of the Amalgamated Bank,

Contact
Hi, sorry for the long reply. Pastebin is a good idea but I never used it so I just set up an account GreenerCardamom. Hopefully that will work for private exchange. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alejandro García Padilla
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alejandro García Padilla. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

why did you delete this information and claim you moved it?
your deletion

Answer here -BoogaLouie (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)


 * BoogaLouie It is better to say "please".


 * The page wouldn't save. The Wikimedia Foundation error message was returned for any edits that I tried to save in article namespace. I placed the content of the entire section here, see here for diff, on 2 Dec 2013 at 6 am. I will now reply per your request. --FeralOink (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikimedia Foundation error message usually last a few minutes in my experiance. It's now been two days since you deleted the 1,860 bytes. In the mean time you've made other edits. no problem with Wikimedia Foundation error message there apparently. --BoogaLouie (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Misunderstanding over. Thank you for working on whatever StackOverflow regex is, and the details you attend to that help make wikipedia more readable. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Macro and security
Could you take a look at this, please, and try to figure out what a better title might be. (assuming it doesn't duplicate other content & is worth keeping)  DGG ( talk ) 18:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Help again with Accenture?
Hey FeralOink, hope you're doing well. A while ago, you helped me make some updates to the article for Accenture. Since then, some of the edits that we discussed have been undone (especially some things in the infobox), and there is some more up to date information about Accenture that I think should be included. I've posted a note over at Talk:Accenture with my thoughts. Since you helped out before, I was hoping you might be able to take a look at what I've proposed and, if everything looks okay, go ahead and make the updates. Also, what do you think about archiving anything on the Talk page from 2012 or before? It's probably worth keeping our recent discussions, but the page is getting a bit unwieldy... Let me know if you have any questions! Cheers! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 21:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again, I just wanted to follow up here and see if you thought you might have time to take a look at this? I'm worried that the background of our previous discussions is quite a barrier to entry for other editors who might otherwise look into these issues. If you're busy, though, I totally understand and can reach out to other folks. Cheers! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ethecon Foundation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ethecon Foundation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello FeralOink! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry
Hi, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Requesting Guidance
Hello. I'm new to the wiki community and would like to start working on editing the Property Insurance page with the help and collaboration of more experienced contributors from Project Finance Participants. There is a recommendation that the Chartis article be merged with AIG's page. I think the Property Insurance page could be strengthened with parts of AIG's page since it shows how current events and emerging trends effect it's regulation by the government. Hurricane Sandy and updated payouts of the WTC are not on the Property Insurance page either - which to me seem to be relevant. Do you think adding more information would be beneficial to the Property Insurance page? If so would you be interested in collaborating what facts should be included? Any response would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.Lgkkitkat (talk) 03:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank You :)
Thanks so much for getting back to me. I'm going to think about what you said in your message and get back to you ASAP.Lgkkitkat (talk) 02:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Nikkimaria (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

AIG - Chartis
In terms of why it is appropriate to merge Chartis with the AIG Wikipedia article we can cite the following talk page posts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chartis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American_International_Group#Merger_Proposal_Chartis

Given that Chartis was a business unit of AIG, the information on its history and divestiture may be better summarized into the AIG Wikipedia article. When Wikipedia readers click the URL on Chartis.com  the Chartis Wikipedia article, it redirects to AIG.com, possibly confusing readers. In terms of how I would conduct clean up, I am fairly new to Wikipedia and haven't done much focus on a specific topic - except researching. So please forgive any errors in my proposal to merge the articles.


 * 1) Summarization: Review the Chartis Wikipedia article and assess the content that has verifiable citations. Then reformat a narrative of the history as well as what led to the divestiture of the business unit.
 * 2) Peer review: Might need your help/advice on this part.  Post the rewrite onto my sandbox for review and final editorial help.

I don't really know what happens after the peer review. So I defer to your experience and guidance. I appreciate your support on this idea. What other ideas and/or guidance do you have at this point? Please me know on my talk page and thank you again for your rapid response. Have a great day. Lgkkitkat (talk) 18:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Lgkkitkat! I perused the Chartis article, the sources, and the talk page. I understand now, and agree that Chartis MUST, in good conscience, be merged into the AIG article. That's very responsible of you, or whomever originally initiated merging. Chartis was very clearly broken off into an SPV in order to distance those (very central) lines of business from the AIG bail-out ignominy. The article sources that. Once the negative publicity blew over, Benmosche didn't feel the need to continue with Chartis e.g. an IPO, and quietly reabsorbed Chartis lines of business back into AIG, as before. It is an important part of AIG corporate history, and merits at least a section in the main AIG article.
 * As for process, please do this,
 * Copy the relevant parts of the AIG article to your sandbox.
 * Draft your merged version there. Let me know if you need help. I'll help/ review what you've done, in your sandbox, and when you are ready, you can post to the already extant merge proposal page, linking or just copying the text of the Chartis into AIG section to the merge discussion page.
 * This should elicit some discussion, and if not, we can round up some editors.
 * We can go from there! --FeralOink (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok - thanks so much for you advice. As for sandboxes...the last time I tried to use it I made a big mess :(

I'll work on it but I for sure will need your help. I have no problems with edits like citations, grammar, punctuation and spelling. Beyond that I need a lot of guidance. Be in touch soon.Lgkkitkat (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

How do we round up editors to back up this idea to merge the pages? I am waiting to hear back from one of the contributors that developed the Chartis page. I think his input could be helpful.Lgkkitkat (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
 Hello FeralOink:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) (c) by &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Plutocracy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Plutocracy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610502779 your edit] to D. E. Shaw & Co. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * /classes.soe.ucsc.edu/ism101/Winter04/ISM101_Salkind_SemAbstract_020504_v2.htm ISM Seminar abstract The Company also uses qualitative analysis to make private equity investments in technology,

re: Vero Electronics Article
Thanks for comment - integration with VPE Article was considered - will now be effected
 * Inclusion of Vero Technologies Ltd was also projected

Cheers Tfitzp (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

AIG - Chartis Part II
Hello. I was away for a little while but I am back now. I have the content I think should be added into AIG from Chartis in my sandbox. Can you please take a peek and let me know what you think? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lgkkitkat/sandboxLgkkitkat (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for contributions to Edward Snowden
I appreciate your series of precise, thoughtful edits earlier today. These are very well done and markedly improve the article's quality. JohnValeron (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Next Step for Chartis
What is the next step for the Chartis info in my sandbox to move to AIG? How do we redirect the Chartis page to AIG? How may editor approvals are needed? Lgkkitkat (talk) 18:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)