User talk:Fergusonloot

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to O Canada has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: O Canada was changed by Fergusonloot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952615 on 2014-11-26T22:24:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Lor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ace Dollasz— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lor Talk 14:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Download(7).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Download(7).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ace Dollasz
Hello Fergusonloot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ace Dollasz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Deunanknute (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Ace Dollasz. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me!  16:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stephen Lewis Secondary School (Vaughan), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deunanknute (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Notability
Being influential in a community is one thing. Being notable by Wikipedia standards is another. Please read WP:BAND about notability for musicians, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources (references) needed to prove it (whatever the subject). Peridon (talk) 17:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ace Dollasz


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ace Dollasz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yoshi24517 Chat Absent 22:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ace Dollasz


A tag has been placed on Ace Dollasz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  A m i t  웃  22:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  A m i t  웃  23:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)