User talk:Fermanagheditor

Minister for Foreign Affairs
You've edited my edit of the Minister for Foreign Affairs page where I had entered Brian Cowen as the Minister for Foreign Affairs. The Section 4 of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) Act 1946 covers this I believe. Sub Section 1 states that the Taoiseach can assign departments to ministers. Sub section states that he can take the appointment away. Subsection 2 seems to apply in that Micheál Martin has resigned and by accepting resignation Taoiseach has taken away the appointment. The logic in saying that The Taoiseach is now the Minister for Foreign affairs is that he has not yet reassigned the department to anyone else. As someone has to be the minister logically it has to be the Taoiseach. The provision for ministers continuing until successor is appointed only applies to ministers holding office when Dail is dissioved as per Article 28.11.2 of the Constitution.

Look at it this way if some sort of emergency arose where the Minister for Foreign Affairs was needed urgently tonight to act (I can't think of such an emergency but humour me!) who would act? Not Micheál he's not longer the minister having resigned. No one else has been assigned the Department by the Taoiseach so the Taoiseach must be the Minister because someone has to be.

Normally another minister would be appointed to the cabinet by being proposed to the Dail but this is unlikely to happen as politically it would be hard to have them elected and subsequently appointed by the President.

Regards Rigger30 (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Looking into your complaint
Unfortunately, I see that John asked you nicely here about various images, and you didn't respond. And at least one of them appears to have been a copyright violation? Rather than get angry, it might be best to simply explain a bit better.--Jimbo Wales 05:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

--Fermanagheditor (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)==I didn't remove anything==

I put in the edit notes that I was alphabetising.

Please stop vandalizing my edits.

75.166.179.110 (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC) You removed an entire section for no reason. This is vandalism. Perhaps you may have been trying to achieve something else but either way you blanked a section. If you need help do not hesitate to ask. Thanks--Fermanagheditor (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ontario Coalition Against Poverty
Hi. With Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, I was actually just undoing my revert of 206.108.31.34's deletion. I had originally reverted it because it looked like vandalism at first glance while doing RC patrol, but I then realized he had laid out his reasons the article's talk page a week ago and is trying to remove unsourced original research, so I reverted my own change as it clearly wasn't vandalism. I'll leave it up to you and him/her as to what you want to do with it now. Thanks. Zachlipton (talk) 23:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Festival of Fools
Ciaran. Apologies for inadvertently wiping out Festival of Fools entry. I edited the page, viewed preview/ sandbox whatever and thought I then published it. Have to say the system is extremely poorly explained. Even this talk page took me an hour to figure out how to input into. and I still have no idea why signing this with four tildes makes any sense whatsoever. So if you have any advice on how I can edit the Festival of Fools page, it would be much appreciated. I am the Director of this festival and, much as I wish it took place in Spain, it actually happens in Belfast as was orignially stated some posts ago, but somebody chose to post a false location. Any help appreciated. Will Will chamberlain (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Stephen Huggett
I've nominated this for deletion as he's a non-notable local councillor and Fermanagh is too small for its leaders to be notable. Valenciano (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michaela McAreavey


A tag has been placed on Michaela McAreavey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220.101 User talk:220.101.28.25\ 00:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Fermanagheditor, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fermanagheditor. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael D. Higgins
Stop leaving "warnings" on my talk page. You are the one who is a) edit warring b) adding factually incorrect info to an article c) going against consensus established in the talk page and d) violating standard wikipedia styles for this topic. Snappy (talk) 19:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)