User talk:Fermat1999

No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Karl Meier 16:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

ArbReq/NYScholar
Just wanted to let you know that you are mentioned in an arbitration request .Notmyrealname 23:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, not sure what led me to put your name on this. It is obviously wrong. I struck it out of my statement so that your comment responding to it would still make sense. Notmyrealname 18:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please see Request for Arbitration
Direct link: I am also informing you of this request for arbitration, initially filed by User talk:Notmyrealname, since you are an "interested party" who contributed comments in Talk:Lewis Libby (see archived talk pages) about these issues pertaining to Libby's "ethnicity" and his identification as "Jewish" and the category "Jewish American lawyers" in Talk:Lewis Libby (archived talk pages); I [had] modified the heading to focus on the articles in dispute as opposed to on a contributor and explained that there [but that was reverted by an administrator]. Thank you for having gone to the link and confirmed earlier that you are aware of this request. --NYScholar 19:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/NYScholar
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/NYScholar. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/NYScholar/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/NYScholar/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale &#124; Blast him / Follow his steps 00:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/NYScholar
The above named arbitration case has closed. All involved parties are granted an amnesty over the edit-warring that had been ongoing but has given the administrators the ability to sanction anyone who begins disruptive editing again.

You may view the full case decision at the case page.

For the Arbitration Committee,

- Penwhale &#124; Blast him / Follow his steps 11:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)