User talk:FernUniP1Bo

Your draft article, Draft:ESEMP (European Society for Early Modern Philosophy)


Hello, FernUniP1Bo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ESEMP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello FernUniP1Bo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:ESEMP (European Society for Early Modern Philosophy) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ESEMP (European Society for Early Modern Philosophy)


A tag has been placed on Draft:ESEMP (European Society for Early Modern Philosophy) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.esemp.de/index_en.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

COI
Thanks for message. You are correct that the text is appropriately licensed, but there was no link provided on the article's talk page to the relevant subpage of the ESEMP site. However, the draft was non-compliant in several other ways. Please read the guidance below.

Your editing pattern and user name indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your only reference was to your own web page and was only used by you to verify the name.
 * There is nothing to suggest that the organisation meets the notability criteria above. From what you told us, it has no headquarters, membership, income or expenditure. The only actual apparent fact (unverified) was the date it started.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your text was nothing but self-serving promotion and opinions; It counts distinguished scholars from different nations among its members... an application for membership... In these pages, you find information... The latest news about activities surrounding the society... information about its bylaws and membership. Also, there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections, particularly when they are spamlinks to your own pages, the only external link should be to your main website

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:23, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the extensive reply.

I already declared my COI, at least I did for the German Wikipedia when I made an upload there. Do I have to do it again for the English one?

Concerning the source: since I have to provide links and there are no other links than the website itself, what source can I use? Is it really not all allowed to use the website I'm writing about as a source?

I can understand the criticisms about the tone and I will try to take care of them.

FernUniP1Bo (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It's only by chance that I saw this message. If you want to message me, you can do so on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it. That will send me an alert.
 * German and English Wikipedias are independent of each other, you must declare your COI here too. You can't use the website itself as a source, other than for basic facts like number of members, you need independent third-party sources to establish notability as described above. If you can't find multiple proper reputable references, your society doesn't meet our notability criteria and won't get an article accepted here. There is nothing in your draft to indicate why it is more than just another non-notable society. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Taio Pain has knowledge Graph On google
I wrote this article according to google knowledge graph panel. Google has published all of these data for everyone. Taiopainsinger (talk) 10:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)