User talk:Fern 24

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ysangkok (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Map of Cyprus
Hi, you have made some comments on the topographic map of Cyprus in Commons. I have updated it. Could you please check the talk page? Thanks --Ikonact (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

June 2015
A few days ago, you posted on my talkpage to ask that we abide by the results of the WP:3O. Yet now that the 3O didn't go your way, you are edit-warring. Please let this go, you lost. Edit-warring will get you absolutely nowhere. I know you meant well, but you are now the problem, not the solution. The way you are rewording sentences only makes them less clear, not more. Please, stop. Athenean (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I could not disagree more. I believe that I stood by the results of WP:3O by rejecting my sentence and not incorporating the quote while continuing to work to a compromise that we could both accept. Rather than continuing to argue about something that I admit, I was wrong in, I tried to propose a constructive edit, which you reverted without any substantive explanation. When I pointed this out you reverted all my edits, even ones you had previously agreed with. Furthermore, you repeatedly claimed that you had won and I had lost, that you should no longer assume good faith because I didn't realize that I had won, and that discussing with me is a waste of time. This clearly violates WP:WIN, WP:GF, and WP:CON. Instead of following these guidelines, you claim that I am the problem and have participated in edit-warring. I would recommend reverting to where we were before my contentious edit, considering the changes we both made, and continue discussing. If you believe that that is not possible or constructive, I would recommend opening an RFC. Fern 24 (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's take things one by one. Here  can you see how your wording ("individuals' greed") in confusing to the reader?  Which individuals does the sentence refer to?  Unless you include "greed on the part of the individuals involved", the sentence is unclear and confusing.  Second, what is going on here is not just destruction, but obliteration of Greek heritage in the north, which is also the wording that the source uses. The 3O also said to avoid quotes, yet until I removed them  they were still there.  Athenean (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I disagree that "individuals' greed" is confusing, but I have no significant problem with "greed on the part of individuals involved". On the other hand, I don't see that the source uses the word "obliteration" ("the deliberate destruction of heritage...", "the result in both cases was destruction"). Finally, I did not include quotes in this sentence, which was what the 3O was referring to. I believe your second edit was unconstructive and a result of your contention over the last sentence rather than a problem with the sentences in and of themselves; several sentences had no added quotes but simply slight rewording, which you reverted without a specific justification. Furthermore, now that other editors are involved I think the page is devolving into an edit war. As I suggested on Talk:Cyprus, I believe opening an RFC is the best way forward at this point, given that two lengthy discussions have failed to reach a mutually acceptable solution. Fern 24 (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iambic pentameter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Prodromos, Cyprus  climate data
the value of year mean  minimum  should  be lower or identidcal to the coldest mean minimum of any

month, and the value of the year mean maximum should be higher or identical to the hottest mean maximum

of any month. this I know by looking at the climate data of New York City

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City#Climate  and assuming they know what they're doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boten4 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)