User talk:Ferraribauer

February 2014
Your recent editing history at Kaaba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I have engaged in Edit war and for Good Reason
Hi. It has been said so many times that images of Prophet Mohammed (SAS) and other Prophets as a matter of fact is a false testament in a way to what they looked like. No one knows in this current situation what they looked like. So posting Their images is a serious offence against Islam. You say you don't censor content. Tell me how come is this censorship. You are allowing wrong information to be imprinted on the website and you say you don't censor content. Freedom is everyone's right and should be performed in a rightful way without hurting one's sentiments. I request Wikipedia again to remove alleged images of Prophets from articles they are present in. This is a serious offence against Islam and Allah doesn't like it. This is totally wrong to our beliefs. I am not an enemy. Just trying to protect my religion from such acts.Ferraribauer (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It is still an edit war and you will be blocked if you continue it. Most Muslim editors respect our guidelines and policies even if they are not in accord with their religion. As an encyclopedia we need to be neutral on religion, not accept any as either wrong or right. Dougweller (talk) 13:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

So you mean that you will let wrong information float on the website just like that? Ferraribauer (talk) 05:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * This is an example of the straw man fallacy. Eik Corell (talk) 08:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Straw Man Fallacy aside, if no one knows how They looked like and that posting Their images is a severe offence against Islam ,why post then? --Ferraribauer (talk) 08:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the insight. Will make sure I do the same. Ferraribauer (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NeilN. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Islam seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Neil N  talk to me  14:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)