User talk:Ferrdann

www.spam.injurylawcolorado.com
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 11:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Redundant citations
Hi Ferrdann, thanks for your recent edits, but it is unnecessary and potentially unhelpful to add citations for statements that are already covered by an existing ref. Edits such as and  also disrupt text–source fidelity in that statements before your added citation are now separated from their supporting references. Additionally, sources like a NYT obituary go through more editorial vetting than a colleague's AHA post, so it's better to use the most reliable source (i.e., leave it as it was). If you are interested in adding references, I recommend checking out the following list of under-referenced articles where your work will have better impact: https://tools.wmflabs.org/bambots/cwb/bycat/Anarchism.html#References%20needed and the section below it. I've been working through this list myself, so let me know if I can be of help. czar 16:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 11:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)