User talk:Ferrett3

Hey and welcome! I noticed your request for adminship. I just wanted to let you know before you get disappointed, your request will probably be removed :( That's because adminship is somewhat restricted; most users expect you to have thousands of edits and many months of working on the project before supporting a RfA.  I hate to be a jerk, but I'd suggest taking it down before someone else does.  I looked at your contributions and you're doing a fine job.  I have no doubt that you mean only the best for Wikipedia, but most users are not trusting enough of newish users to give them the admin tools, because they could be harmful in the wrong hands (you can see WP:GRFA for more info}. I'd suggest keeping up the good work for six months or so and trying again then. I'm sure you'll be a great admin in time! I'm certainly willing to discuss this more, drop me a note on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Peace, delldot | talk 03:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * As delldot notes above, your RfA has been removed. I've closed it because with less than 50 edits, the chance that your RfA will succeed is nil. Please note that during 2006, there were nearly 200 RfAs done with candidates having less than 1,000 edits. Not one of them passed. The closing of this RfA as failed is not a reflection on you. Please keep up your fine work and take up delldot's suggestions for reading WP:GRFA and hanging around for some months before trying for adminship again. If there's any way in which I can help, please do not hesitate to ask. All the best, --Durin 03:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:180px-Stephen schwartz publicity photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Stephen schwartz publicity photo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:180px-Stephen schwartz publicity photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Stephen schwartz publicity photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:PVGC Action Shot.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:PVGC Action Shot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Melesse (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)