User talk:Feuillade

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Feuillade,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community Portal
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How to edit a page
 * How to revert to a previous version of a page
 * Tutorial
 * Copyrights
 * Shortcuts

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage. Please add  to your userpage.

--PEAR 01:20, August 2006 (UTC)

Roseann Quinn
Thanks again for all the work you have done on Roseann Quinn. I'm sorry you have been removing some of the content. I hope it's not a response to any edits. On Wikipedia, original research has a very specific meaning. It is not contributions made by you, but material that is not from a primary source (i.e. your own opinions, or unpublished material). I added back the IMDb links for that reason-- that is not original research as defined here. In addition, this article needs to be encyclopedic in tone, which means we have to adhere to neutral point of view. In this case, that means presenting the material in a dry, straightforward manner, without editorializing and without the stylistic feel of the true crime genre. Finally, you removed the Susan Brownmiller references, which is generally not done without a discussion on the talk page for an article. It's a published source, and even if you disagree with some of the statements made, we have to present all views in a neutral manner.

You have obviously read a lot about this case, and I hope you will continue to edit. I know it can be off-putting to have your text edited, but you must assume good faith on the part of all editors. We all want this article and every article here to be comprehensive, verifiable, reliable, and neutral. Again, thanks for all the great work you have done so far, and I look forward to continuing to improve this article according to established guidelines. Those of us who believe information should be free and available to everyone appreciate your efforts! Jokestress 20:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Quinn.jpg image
I am sorry about reverting the image used under that title to the original photo of the Fox News Live anchor, but could you consider uploading the image to something like Rosannquinn.jpg instead. Chris (Talk) (Contribs) 02:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * My mistake -- I thought it was another version of the same photo that I uploaded previously. My apologies.
 * Not a problem Chris (Talk) (Contribs) 02:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:RQuinn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RQuinn.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought I had pointed out several times already that the image is public domain, as evidenced by the fact that three New York newspapers (the Times, the Daily News and the Post) used it without attribution. The best bet is that the photo originated with the NYPD. Feuillade 04:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:All_State_Cafe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:All_State_Cafe.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Pope John Paul II Statue.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pope John Paul II Statue.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RQuinn.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:RQuinn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:253 West 72nd Street.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:All State Cafe.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:253 West 72nd Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:253 West 72nd Street.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:All State Cafe.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:All State Cafe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)