User talk:Feureau/Archive/2006/Oct

Salticidae
hi,

i noticed that you split up the List of Salticidae species in a handful of smaller pages. Just wanted to let you know that you're not the first one doing this, and it would be much better to first inform the author (me ;) of this, because there are reasons why the file is that large. So, in case you want to split more spider species pages, please let me know, or even better, leave a message at WP:SPI. cheers :) --Sarefo 13:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

hi, the idea was not that is is *my* article, but that there are reasons it's this long, and I, being the author, could tell you what they are :) cheers --Sarefo 14:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

2001 ALDS
I tried finding the weasel words that prompted you to put the tag on this article, and the closest phrase I could find was "One of the most unusual defensive plays in postseason history took place in Game 3." The phrase seems more akin to a peacock term than a weasel word, and even then it's a bit of a stretch, as the article isn't about the play itself, but both the Yankees/A's and Mariners/Indians series. I'll have the talk page watched, so you can respond there or on mine. Counterfit 03:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Vote
Hi Fellow-WikiPedian, This thing came up:  Articles for deletion/Where Troy Once Stood. Would you like to vote? Antiphus 20:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Feureau/UserBox/ComedyCommunication
Hi. As the template's creator, I was wondering if it would be a problem if we moved the template into my userspace. I would have done this when it was still in the Template namespace, but personally I am opposed to WP:GUS. Thanks, Shards of metal  [ Talk •  Contribs  ] 04:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for smiling at me! I've never seen anybody smile at someone before (on the wiki, that is), and it made my day. Second, what do you think about this? Since there are not too many people who have updated their userpages to reflect the new template, I could move it, and manually update the pages of users who already updated. I won't start anything unless I get your approval. Tell me what you think, Shards of metal  [ Talk •  Contribs  ] 01:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

List of Avengers issues
The article you created has been submitted for deletion according to Deletion policy. Please vote at Articles for deletion/List of Avengers issues. Thank you. --Jamdav86 16:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Signspotting
Just to say, this is not necessarily linked just to roads. I just linked it from the street sign theft as people were stealing funny signs. Simply south 22:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Firefox TOC, and Swiftfox
Hi there. I don't understand your edits to pages including the Firefox TOC. There are two separate parts - I don't understand why you edited back in the Firefox TOC to the 3rd party builds/distributions. I clearly stated a discussion about this, and clearly commented my edits. You did neither, so I am left without knowing you motivation, and without a chance of reaching consensus. Secondly, you reinserted stub status to Swiftfox, with the same lack of discussion or consensus. Please could you check my comments and reasons, so we can get this sorted out. For the legal issues as mentioned, I feel that I must remove the TOC from swiftfox, which I feel more responsible for. I think you should at least check my comments, and others about this issue and I suggest you remove the TOC from pages where you've added it back. Of course, the only good solution is to create a 3rd party build TOC, as suggesed by another editor. I am also copy this to the talk page, as you suggest on your usertalk page. Widefox 14:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Swiftfox

 * hey, like the smile!

anyhow, I'm guessing you haven't seen this above yet? (please see my comment above). I've reunified on your page, as it's where the thread started.... Simple - a new box needs creating, as listed there. Nothing more to add really. suggest all discussion on that talk page, as agreed. Widefox 19:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk Pages
not really interested in my page, but this keeps the thread together, and I consider that upmost, from conversational point of view. anyhow, suggest all further talk to be done on TOC talk, as per comment. Widefox 19:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Suspect Vandalism
I looked over the edits you were talking about and they don't seem to make very much sense. Though I would be hesitant to label it vandalism, as per WP:AGF it definately seems to be pointless. Other than that things seem to be changed back to how they should be, so for now I wouldn't do anything else personally. Cheers.  Canadian - Bacon  t  c   e 14:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Email Money Transfer
I can see you added the  tag on the Email Money Transfer. I invite you to discuss about it on Talk:Email Money Transfer and explain why you think it reads like an advertisement... compared to what it was like before I attempted to make it more neutral. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 01:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship
As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

To help you with your welcoming of new Esperanza members...
... TangoTango has kindly written up a script that once a week lists all of the new members to Esperanza. The list can be found at User:Tangotango/New members of Esperanza; it is updated once a week, and will show all of the new members since the last update. If you're not sure if everyone who joined the past week has been welcomed, that is a great place to check! I hope that helps you in your welcome, and thank you for making a point to greet new Esperanzians! -- Nataly a 18:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

"suspect" vandalism
I saw your message on Canadian-Bacon's talk page and I thought I would clarify something for you. No, I'm not a vandal. I didn't mean to make the edit you cited. I was changing a redirect to the article and I accidently made the page itself redirect. If you have something you need to ask me, please be up front about it, theres no need to ask for a opinion by an admin when you haven't discussed it with me. I apologize for the edit, it was a mistake. semper fi — Moe  15:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Bandwidth management
Hi, I don't understand why you added a tone warning to my article on Bandwidth management (see ). Please could you be more specific about what needs to be changed?