User talk:Fewlers

Welcome!
Hello, Fewlers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jeremy Bloom did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Panian513 19:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi can you please refer to what sources were not verifiable? Fewlers (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I linked all of the changes that I made on a an article that hasn't been updated in 10 years. Can you give me insight? Fewlers (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Fewlers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. "Highly successful" is not neutral. ~WikiOriginal-9~  ( talk ) 22:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * As a fan of Skiing I noticed that Jeremy Bloom's wikipedia isn't up to date. Can you please give me insight as to what is bias about the edits that I'm making? Fewlers (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremybloomfan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The Wordsmith Talk to me 18:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Please let me defend my case Fewlers (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This is not a duck situation because the information I contributed is factual. I worked very hard to contribute relevant information to an out dated page. Please The Wordsmith, the punishment of blocking my account does not fit the crime of caring to update a page with factual information. All I have ever wanted is to contribute to this community in an uplifting and factual way. Fewlers (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)