User talk:Fezmar9/Archive 1

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cristalix album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cristalix album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Bledsilenttreatment.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bledsilenttreatment.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

This is Hell Demo
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article This is Hell Demo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of This is Hell Demo. -- Jeandré, 2008-01-17t11:53z

January 2008
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gwernol 20:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thisishellmisfortunescoverart.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thisishellmisfortunescoverart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Murder the Dance
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Murder the Dance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Murder the Dance. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  19:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome, foo!
Yo!

Hello, Fezmar9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

boo
the only info ur adding is the certification which is not nessacy since its on the page of the album, if we were to put all the info on the discovery page, theres no need for the page itself, u have a annoying habit of coming where u shudnt, the page has been like thi sfor weeks until u drove in, so stop because im not the only one who changed it to this, im not the one of orginally did it, i just think they made the apge the best so im agreeing with them to keep it, thanx, USEDfan (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * i meant to sent that message to sum1 else, but uve been a problem 4 me too so i guess its ok u sent it, the article says a live room, like a place a small concert wud be held but with no fans is what i assume, USEDfan (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * very important info, its obvious what it means, they want to rent a room to record an album, instead of tradictional studio, it makes fine sense and is good for the little info we have been told aobut the new album. USEDfan (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Msiifspecialeditioncover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Msiifspecialeditioncover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Msiifvinyleditioncover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Msiifvinyleditioncover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Pass The Flask (reissue)
I hope you don't make a habit out of destroying b-class articles.... -Violask81976 02:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're merging, but the reissue is more notable than the original album - it's alot more covered source-wise than the original. How can it be less notable? -Violask81976 02:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Because wikipedia is not paper. -Violask81976 20:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * But to be honest, would you call an album with 11 bonus tracks a true reissue? There's sources that call it an "album that catalog's the Bled's entire existance" (not exactly quoted). Plus, considering the album is far more notable than the original ever was, I definately see an exception. Wikipedia's rules are not hard-and-fast or set-in-stone.-Violask81976 21:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * How about if we bring it up at WP:ALBUM? -Violask81976 18:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Msimastermindsinglecoverart.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Msimastermindsinglecoverart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

bloodsimple.
Yeah, if it is necessary to capitalize, then that's fine, I just didn't want it to be changed unless it was in violation of something. -- Shatterzer0 (talk) 04:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The Used
I had to laugh when I saw this, couldn't find any neon flashing lights or the like could you? Let's hope it works!! Regards Nouse4aname (talk) 09:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and incase you weren't aware, User:USEDfan has been indef blocked: ANI, thanks to User:Landon1980 for being proactive. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think now that USEDfan is no more, hopefully things around the Used should calm down. He accused me (and you I think, as well as anyone else that disagreed with him) as being sockpuppets several times, even trying to report us to various admins. Happy editing! Nouse4aname (talk) 10:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Yamaha519vx
Dude honestly quit being an asshole and deleted all the stuff I do. I work hard on some of the stuff and some of the stuff I would like to keep there so quit deleteing it you dipshit.

Smells Like Children
Well, it's normally called an EP and it is certainly not a compilation. I too find it odd that it is called an EP, but that seems to be what it is normally classified is. I would myself say it is a studio album. Zazaban (talk) 20:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Compilation refers to a collection of already released trakcs. It is not a compilation.

Blink-182 discography
Nice work. Your new edits on the Blink-182 discography page look great! Keep up the good work. Ł ittle Ä lien¹8² (talk\contribs) 00:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Senses Fail
I don't consider absolutepunk a reliable guide on capitalization, but there will be plenty of time later to make any necessary corrections. Normally "is" and "a" would be lower case, but leave it to Buddy. . . --Wehwalt (talk) 02:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lostprophets' fourth studio album
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lostprophets' fourth studio album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

This War Is Ours
Hello.. I was just wondering how/where you got the cover art for Escape The Fate's "This War Is Ours."ScorchOurBodies (talk) 02:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Nah, I'm not upset. I was merely wondering where you found it. XD —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScorchOurBodies (talk • contribs) 11:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Riseagainst appealtoreason.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Riseagainst appealtoreason.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Poisonthewell oneofthree coverart.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Poisonthewell oneofthree coverart.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ThekillersDAYANDAGE.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ThekillersDAYANDAGE.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

?
What? Xx emote xx (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

2009 metal releases
Heh, good timing: I'm working on tracking down sources for those albums without them right now. Prophaniti (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Leathermouth is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Leathermouth saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Kmaster (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Leathermouth
I have nominated Leathermouth, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Leathermouth&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Lookwhatididmyfirsttime2art.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lookwhatididmyfirsttime2art.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 23:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop
Half Hour of Power is an EP. It never has been, never was, and never will be a studio album. It says on the liner notes of the album "This EP is dedicated to the band Closet monster" it does not say "This LP is dedicated to the band closet monster". Please check your facts before making stupid edits.70.242.179.192 (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Let's continue this conversation at Talk:Sum 41 discography. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Above IP
Hello! I noticed you recently reverted just about every edit contributed by this IP user, and thought there were a few things you should know. First, he is a highly disruptive editor that will likely ignore anything you tell him and edit any page how he sees fit. All of the edits you have undone, he will simply revert. It is also likely that this user is a sockpuppet of User:LukeTheSpook. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks man, I'm on his case ;-) - He's the one who got me desysopped (LukeTheSpook)! Thanks for stopping by friend! :-) (By the way, per WP:BAN, you have the right to revert every one of his edits) Scarian  Call me Pat!  18:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Btw, let's get you set up on an RfA one day soon! Scarian  Call me Pat!  18:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, I was unaware you two had history together! I see I came to the right user. And I'm not really sure about the whole admin thing - I'd probably have way too much fun with protection privileges... Fezmar9 (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thisishellbandpic.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Thisishellbandpic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Old Crows / Young Cardinals tracklisting
Hey, I'm not a reader of Kerrang! so i don't know what the disputed article looks like, have you seen it? I couldn't comment until i had seen it myself. --SteelersFanUK06  ReplyOnMine!   18:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Darkest Day - Darkest Days
the link did go to a Stabbing Westward album. "Darkest Day" is the name of the Obituary album, "Darkest Day" is a SW album. I've no idea why that link took me to the SW one, some kind of link jump I guess, but that's the only reason I took it out. Just wanted to clear that up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.204.92 (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Greeleyestatesgowest.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Greeleyestatesgowest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Used
Sorry, thought it was vandalism. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 04:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Actually, there are quite a few. He Is Legend, as you know, is one, as are Alesana, A Skylit Drive, The Morning Of, Scapegoat, and Boxbomb; they have a distribution deal with EastWest Records, if I'm not mistaken, and they recently got a full-page profile in Alternative Press, which is frankly a great deal more coverage than most non-major labels ever get from newspapers and magazines. There are a few groups on their roster that have potential notability, like Akissforjersey and Telescreen (who opened for Dredg on a nationwide tour and had their EP reviewed in AP last year). Worth looking into, though I haven't made a formal case to do so yet; certainly enough to justify keeping it a redlink. Chubbles (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:This Is War
Ok! Sorry. --Dear87 (talk) 15:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

The Used discography
Why did you remove the source and under pressure. Under pressure should be listed there just like the back of your mouth and all other bsides are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix 12 22 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That does not make sense. I started wikipedia in a class this semister and got addicted for all i learned.  I then realized all bands made a page, but my favorite My Chem was locked.  I came to my 2nd favorite and saw a bit of information was a little out of date so i tried to do some minor edits, just a few sentences since I am not fimilar with major edits and page changes yet.  I didn't realise I did it wrong through. Sorry, but from what I know about editing, I think it was fine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix 12 22 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ohhh okay. That makes sense. All the pages had the whole discovery so I thought it was suppose to have the ep. I fixed the other pages too. Thanks for the help buddy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix 12 22 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

MansonUSA and The Link rot template
Does MansonUSA delete news? I'm trying to fix the bare url problem by mostly replacing to links to magazine articles (such as Kerrang!) with , and removing unneeded citations such as the ones on the track listing, but I need to know if MansonUSA.com removes news from their website after an amount of time. (my guess is yes, but I want to make sure). And if they do remove news, do you have any suggestions of how we can get the information that MansonUSA provided, (since mansonusa doesn't always give resources) KMFDM FAN (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The cite note for the name of the album was removed, we don't need that, citations in the review section were removed because links to those same reviews are already in the Professional reviews section, and the track listing bonus track section, because we don't need to confirm what bonus tracks are on the album, because they don't need a cite note you just need to own the album. KMFDM FAN (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Cool. And I don't think we need to worry about MANSONusa removing info, according to what I read they've kept info from now all the way back to 2003. KMFDM FAN (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

2x platinum thing
Yeah i thought i heard that too, that being certified double platinum was different than selling 2 million..but what exxactly could that be

I think the article was wrong most likely, but yeah —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.44.103 (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

With Roots Above and Branches
I don't understand why you insist on deleting the information on the origin of the song titles. On the page for Plagues there is a section on the origin of song titles. There are also sections like this on the pages for Infinity on High and From Under The Cork Tree. The information is not decreasing any helpfulness of the page, and it is better to have more information on an article than none at all. Jstar37 (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Conversation continued at Talk:With Roots Above and Branches Below. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Live in Tokyo
Could you define the "speculative" part of the article "Live in Tokyo (Finch album)"? It's confirmed, it was sourced with the official website, there was official artwork, and there is the setlist and most likely tracklist from that show. Please comment back with why it isn't worth noting. Thanks! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Windeh (talk • contribs) 17:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I'll bare that in mind for the future. Thanks once again :) --Windeh (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Repley
I have been here for like a month and all I did was add confirmed songs to the page and fixed the release date. I don't know why your hasseling me. Please stop, Cheers. -Jakers 78 (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Artwork
When I talked to Dan, he said there will most likely be a special edition. As of now the Used have just mentioned an exclusive pre-order starting July 24. I think it will just be like a t-shirt bundle and those sites either mis-read it or got some other news but by the way those sites say it it sounds like you just get some extra swag with it. We shall find out soon enough. Cheers. -Jakers 78 (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Because they rule! lol, I don't know. I thought stuff like that goes on here. But it isn't need like you said but if there is a deluxe version of the album then I will add it to the page faster then a jack rabit riding a motorcyle once I find out about it. Cheers. -Jakers 78 (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of We the Fallen


The article We the Fallen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not clear how this album is notable. Lacks references to reviews in 3rd party sources or chart information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Artwork
Thanks for the heads up. Some people never change, hey? While I'm here, I've seen you've done some work on the Brand New article in the past. It's recently been tagged with GA reassessment (deservedly so!), I was wondering if you'd head over there and give us a hand? It's going to be a big job! Cheers. k.i.a.c ( talktome  -  contribs ) 15:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * For now, yes. If you're interested, I've compiled a list of links (interviews, articles) in my sandbox, though it's not very readable. It appears that the reviewer just wants the refs sorted out first and will then move onto the prose etc later. k.i.a.c  ( talktome  -  contribs ) 18:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Bleeding Through
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Bleeding Through/GA2. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

oops sorry
im sorry for linking unrated allmusic reviews for several albums, i just thought it would be a good idea to do that because it gives a source to the albums to prove that they really exist...:-) arbie (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[arbies92] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arbies92 (talk • contribs)

War is the Answer
Don't just delete my posts, actually look it up before deleting them. I don't know how to post a link, and since you'd like one, here it is: http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/BlabberMouth.Net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=119993 Album original release date: June 8 Then pushed to: October 6 Then pulled forward to: September 22. I'm going to go back and change it to the correct post. Which is what I was putting. What surprises me is that it took me calling you out for you to use a generic attack on me. Also, as I couldn't see who was messing with my posts, the article was the only way for me to get through to you, and I did that fairly politely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morbus Rising (talk • contribs)

So you basically can run around deleting whatever you want as long as it's not cited? Wow, license to kill. Most people won't post a fake release date, and even if it was, I was too specific for it to be random anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morbus Rising (talk • contribs) 18:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Liner notes
i just received something from you stating that i didnt have the right citation i'm sorry but i have the album right in front of me and thats were i got the info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by X62008 (talk • contribs)

ok well im new to the whole editing thing not to the site just the editing. im on this site all the time i figured ill try to contribute. but i didnt know how to cite so thats why i ddint do it, so again my fault

Your Ice Nine Kills Article
I was looking at your sandbox and I know that this band ahs had articles written several times, each time being deleted afterwards, but I really do think that they have proven themselves and you should try to write that article for real this time. The Hyphen 22:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Deconstruction
Don't want to undo again on 2010 in metal in case of edit warring, so could you have a look at the talk page when you get the chance, and we can discuss it there :) 87.194.171.224 (talk) 08:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Daisy
In the interest of ending edit warring, I'm going to respect the deletion of the review. I maintain that the site is not a blog but a website with a paid staff composed of professional journalists. The personal blog rules should not apply to it. In this case, it should remain in the article until the larger publications release reviews and there's no longer room for this one. Spidercomrade (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

RE: punknews.org My bad, I've read the WP Albums list, but didn't notice punknews.org there.Antiscene (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Album cover
Were would I put the reference.   Bugboy52.4 |  =-=  23:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Rob Zombie tracklisting
Hi, sorry to be a pain but I put the revert back on the tracklisting template I put on. I am not sure what you mean by 'too complicated' when you changed my edit. I put this template on as it is more tidier and in time the tracklist times will be added. I am happy to discuss this with you further. And if I understand the revert you made better and what you mean by too complicated am willing to concede on this. EmmaJL5 (talk)
 * Ah, that makes sense. I concede to the edit.  As soon as the track lengths become available I'll look at editing then. I'm still learning all these different ways of putting things together.  I had used it because it looked tidier than just the numbered list.  Thanks again for explaining.  Take care. EmmaJL5 (talk)

Jars charting
The source I gave u shows the Billboard Hot Mainstream Rock Tracks for 10/24/09. The website has 13 pages and the 8th page has the chart.76.110.128.158 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

The list where Jars peaked at #3 IS the mainstream rock chart76.110.128.158 (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

the web page I showed u. It has 13 charts in 13 pages. Page 8 is the Mainstream Rock chart —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.128.158 (talk) 01:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I GAVE U A SPECIFIC ANSWER! THEY ARE THE CHARTS OF BILLBOARD!!!!. GET IT, DUDE?!76.110.128.158 (talk) 02:37, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I gave u a different source. They do show the Mainstream Rock, Alternative Songs, Billboard Hot 100, etc.76.110.128.158 (talk) 12:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Just outta curiosity
Just outta curiosity, do you like Atreyu? Oh, and I was reading your page, funny, "accused me of trying to get laid by advertising 'my band' on wikipedia," you just gotta learn how to ignore the lol.   Bugboy52.4 |  =-=  00:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That's kool, a lot of people say that. Anyway, I released ALL the full songs on youtube in case you want to see them - and look on the right under uploads (also click see all). I suggest Ravenous, Bleeding is a Luxury, and You Were the King, Now You're Unconscious, tell me what you think!   Bugboy52.4  |  =-=  00:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahhh come on! Don't be like that... lol. Anyway, I'm sure they'll delete it, or it might become legal when the album is released before they do. But seriously, what songs did you like?   Bugboy52.4 |  =-=  01:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Man, you became just like the ass who accused you of trying to get laid.   Bugboy52.4 |  =-=  16:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I can see I'm not getting anywhere with you, but at least I tried. And if I answered those questions... well it wouldn't make what you think of me any different.   Bugboy52.4 |  =-=  12:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Abce2 | This is  not a test  02:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * For historical purposes, the warning is regarding this comment I left on User:Bugboy52.40's talk page and is related to the above conversation about Atreyu. Fezmar9 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

could u do me a favor
in the 30 seconds to mars discography page, they keep putting #20 on the mainstream rock chart peak. could u tell them that that peak is for the rock songs chart?76.110.128.158 (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Tim meh  22:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Prophaniti socks
Can you fill out a WP:SPI for User:Prophaniti, their socks, and the evidence relating the socks to Prophaniti? When you're done, let me know the link so I can follow it. Thanks, tedder (talk) 19:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This will be my first SPI. In the past I have contributed to a couple investigations, but I have never started one on my own. It looks pretty self explanatory, but if I make a mistake let me know :) Fezmar9 (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, no worries. We are almost all human, mistakes happen. I blocked User:ClueBot twice recently by accident. :-) tedder (talk) 20:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have opened a case at Sockpuppet investigations/Prophaniti. Fezmar9 (talk) 21:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Welcome to wikipedia my dear friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.129.168 (talk) 04:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Removing of References in 2010 in Heavy Metal Music.
You will halt your deletion of the references. all information must be kept catolouged and references to keep people up to date on whats happening with their recording, and when their albums to be expected are to be released. your removal of facts and instead installing a format with little to none information (which isn't the point of wikipedia) will stop at this moment. as the creator of the page u will either stop or i can have u permenantly unable to edit this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (User:Ant smusher) 14:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)