User talk:Ffranc/Archive 1

Stanisław Potrzebowski
Hey, how movement he established? --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * His article says that he founded Rodzima Wiara. Are you hinting that this shouldn't count as a separate movement, because it's part of a larger rodnover movement? I guess the line can be hard to draw between what counts as a broader tradition, a movement or just an organization. Ffranc (talk) 04:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lokstenes dievturu svētnīca has been accepted
 Lokstenes dievturu svētnīca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 03:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Lokstenes_dievturu_sv%C4%93tn%C4%ABca help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hof Ásatrúarfélagsins has been accepted
 Hof Ásatrúarfélagsins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hof_%C3%81satr%C3%BAarf%C3%A9lagsins help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Andreas Weber (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Andreas Weber (disambiguation).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

I moved this disambiguation page to Andreas Weber (disambiguation).

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kb03 (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Forseti (band)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Forseti (band).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Terre et Peuple
Hello, Ffranc,

Thanks for creating Terre et Peuple! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 19:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Neopagan music
Hello, Ffranc,

Thanks for creating Neopagan music! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Germanic mythology
Template:Germanic mythology has been nominated for merging with Template:Germanic paganism. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The Homeric Gods
valereee (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

The Voyage Home (2004 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Voyage Home (2004 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Il ritorno


A tag has been placed on Il ritorno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"R2 (technically), target moved into draft."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 大诺史 (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of De reditu


A tag has been placed on De reditu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"R2 (technically), target moved into draft."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 大诺史 (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Epsilon Team


A tag has been placed on Epsilon Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Epsilon Team. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 13:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Voyage Home (2004 film) has been accepted
 The Voyage Home (2004 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! 97198 (talk) 01:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=The_Voyage_Home_(2004_film) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Citation request
Please provide a citation to your recent edits to Winter solstice. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Great new article at God's Zeal!

buidhe 16:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC) 
 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Picnic on the Grass does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll try to keep that in mind. One of my edits was mainly copy editing and the addition of a short legacy section. The other replaced some blogs marked with "better source needed" with a reliable source. Ffranc (talk) 08:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

"Experiment in Evil" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Experiment in Evil. Since you had some involvement with the Experiment in Evil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Picnic on the Grass
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Picnic on the Grass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gatoclass -- Gatoclass (talk) 04:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Picnic on the Grass
The article Picnic on the Grass you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Picnic on the Grass for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gatoclass -- Gatoclass (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rällinge statuette
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rällinge statuette you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yakikaki -- Yakikaki (talk) 22:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rällinge statuette
The article Rällinge statuette you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rällinge statuette for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yakikaki -- Yakikaki (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Freya Aswynn
Hi How are you? I reverted that article back to the redirect as part of WP:NPP. I was planning push it into Draft, but I can't find a single standalone reference which verifies her as being notable. I do understand that in any particular field, however obscure, byzantine or niche it is, there is always somebody who stands out and is notable and is worthy of an article, but evidence must be visible, and I can't see it. If you can give me WP:THREE references that I can verify.  scope_creep Talk  15:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I made a new attempt with a couple of more sources. The main ones in terms of SIGCOV would be Schnurbein 2016, Mountfort 2015 and Rabinovitch 2002. Mountfort is the least substantial of the three, with about one third of a page about Aswynn. Ffranc (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Ffranc, It is certainly esoteric. I found several mentions and descriptions of her, on Google books. including several books she has authored. As an author alone, there is probably sufficient notability there, but it is very slim. The article has been posted back on to the NPP queue, so another editor will be coming along who will make an independent judgement. See what happens I guess.  scope_creep Talk  08:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Hoby treasure
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Chimeras
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

GOCE copyedit request
I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article In Praise of Polytheism. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 )  23:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of In Praise of Polytheism
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article In Praise of Polytheism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 06:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of In Praise of Polytheism
The article In Praise of Polytheism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:In Praise of Polytheism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of In Praise of Polytheism
The article In Praise of Polytheism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:In Praise of Polytheism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 09:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 10:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * Thank you! Ffranc (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!

 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 13:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for In Praise of Polytheism
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Turkish neopagans


A tag has been placed on Category:Turkish neopagans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Jörmundur Ingi Hansen
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jörmundur Ingi Hansen has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot! Ffranc (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jörmundur Ingi Hansen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jörmundur Ingi Hansen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Artémis, cœur d'artichaut
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jörmundur Ingi Hansen
The article Jörmundur Ingi Hansen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jörmundur Ingi Hansen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for A Reading from Homer
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Nostos: The Return
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Nostos
Hello, I just read your recent article on Piavoli's Nostos: The Return. It was extensively researched and a pleasure to read. Thank you for poring over this beautiful and obscure film. Best regards, Soapwort (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. Ffranc (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nostos: The Return

 * Cheers! Looks great, thanks a lot. Ffranc (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Tamar (poem)
A very well-written article. Do you perhaps have a DYK in mind? -- Ashley yoursmile!  09:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Not really. Do you want to do one? Ffranc (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I do have one in mind. How about this:
 * .. that Tamar, an epic poem by the American writer Robinson Jeffers, makes references to the Books of Samuel in the Old Testament? Ashley  yoursmile!  09:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. Nominate it if you want to. Ffranc (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I just nominated it. You can find the entry here. :) Ashley  yoursmile!  10:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nice! Ffranc (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nice! Ffranc (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nostos: The Return
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nostos: The Return you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Aki Cederberg moved to draftspace
Article might be encyclopedic but is written as though it were a resumé so bad that it would need to be re-written significantly from scratch to meet our standard, hence incubation seems to be the only reasonable route to follow at this moment.

Your GA nomination of Nostos: The Return
The article Nostos: The Return you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nostos: The Return for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Finnish neopagans


A tag has been placed on Category:Finnish neopagans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tamar (poem)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
for your review of mysteries of Isis, which pushed me to clarify aspects of the topic that I had unwisely ignored. That's the best kind of review, the kind whose necessity is asserted by the quotation at the top of my own user page. Unfortunately, other circumstances made me feel I needed to withdraw the nomination, but I hope to renominate at a more propitious time. I'd appreciate your support when I do so. A. Parrot (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That's sad to see. I agree with the people who have commented at the FAC page that this seems unnecessary and you can ignore the guy on the talk page. But it's your decision. If the FAC is closed I will place Featured article candidates/Mysteries of Isis/archive2 on my watchlist and give my support once you renominate the article. Ffranc (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Mysteries of Isis GA Reassessment
Mysteries of Isis, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Charles Bélanger Nzakimuena (talk) 07:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Arvīds Brastiņš
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Modern Paganism and New Age
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aki Cederberg has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Aki Cederberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Aki_Cederberg help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: request for copy editing
Hi Ffrank, I'm happy to pick this up. I've had a quick perusal and have a couple of suggestions: as a reader, I found the references a bit overcomplicated. Could we merge them into 'Notes and references' and 'Bibliography' or similar? 'Further Reading' for a relatively short article doesn't seem appropriate. And the section headings could perehaps be clearer and more to the point. See what you think and let me know when I change them. From 'categorisation' I'm assuming British English. Richard asr (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Paganism and New Age
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Modern Paganism and New Age you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 00:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Lone Furrow
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

"Wotan" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wotan. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thespündragon 05:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Paganism and New Age
The article Modern Paganism and New Age you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Modern Paganism and New Age for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Paganism and New Age
The article Modern Paganism and New Age you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Modern Paganism and New Age for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 01:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Harpya

 * Thank you very much! Ffranc (talk) 08:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries; good luck with your planned GA nom. :) Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hilda Vīka
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harpya
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harpya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 02:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harpya
The article Harpya you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harpya for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Harpya
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Verein für germanisches Heidentum
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Review
Hello, I reviewed and approved your DYK, I am not excited by either hook but I did not want to hold it up. ATL1 was my choice. Thanks for a great article. Bruxton (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Finnestorp
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Late Visitors to Pompeii
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Bruxton (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Skálmöld & Sinfóníuhljómsveit Íslands
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Egyptian Queen
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Un été avec Homère
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Panta Rhei (film)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for André Delvaux
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sadko (painting)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC) the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Separate matter from Yulia Tolopa discussion
In the Talk:Yulia Tolopa discussion I looked on your user page and saw you had a list of articles. I thought that meant you had written them mostly yourself, as that's what I use my user page for, but now see they're aspirational, articles you think should be written. Correct? If so, what is one of those that you would like written, and think has a good chance of becoming a reasonable article, but that you aren't going to get to yourself any time soon? I like writing about different subjects, and might try turning one of those red links green. If you're OK with that, I wouldn't want to step on your toes. Also, I probably won't do as good a job as you would, since it not my specialty, and could take a fair bit of time to do it ... but I like variety so it seems like it might be fun. --GRuban (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That would be nice although you shouldn't feel compelled to do it. The purpose is mainly to force myself to create the articles (or sometimes read the books for the first time) so they finally can be removed from the silly list. The most prominent book there is Renan's Life of Jesus, which really is a serious omission from English Wikipedia and for example has an article on ruwp. Heliogabalus and Trilby are also serious omissions and should be pretty easy to find at least some sources for, although more expansive articles might be hard to write without French-language offline sources. Ffranc (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm a volunteer, I can't be compelled to do anything here. But I do like to cooperate with other dedicated editors. Even when I think they are wrong! So very wrong! I collaborated on two articles after an argument with another editor as a sign of no hard feelings. (They're about games, so you may not appreciate them, but I think they turned out nicely, even if I do say so myself.) In fact, even on the article we discussed, Yulia Tolopa, there was a guy who tried to delete a source that I thought was rather important. We argued about it, eventually came to a half-satisfying conclusion (the tag objecting to the source is still in the article, but at least so is the source), and after it was over I found some reasonable images to illustrate some of his articles which he seemed to really like (if the number of exclamation points is anything to go by; still didn't remove the tag, though, sigh). I truly respect the people who donate their time and effort here, and like the idea that we can cooperate in general, even if we disagree on some details.
 * I can read Russian fine, but The Life of Jesus doesn't appeal as much, at least partly because ... well, I haven't spoken to a Rabbi in years, but ... So, I think I'll look into Trilby ou le Lutin d'Argail, as I like fantasy at times. I can also read French somewhat though you wouldn't want to see me write in it. I'll start it at User:GRuban/Trilby, but there may not be much there for some time. When I get some traction on a draft, I'll ping you and you can have a look if you like. Don't know if that will be days or months, though, and if you get the urge to do it yourself before I've done much, just say. --GRuban (talk) 17:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * And ... I already lied! (Proving that prediction is very difficult, especially of the future.) I haven't lied in that I haven't written much, but I already want to consult with you. I found some images. Though you can't tell from Yulia Tolopa, I really like images. However, I think one of the images is misidentified, and I'd like to confer with someone who cares, who is hopefully you. https://www.oldbookillustrations.com/titles/contes-de-charles-nodier/ is a list of 8 beautiful engravings by Tony Johannot of Contes de Charles Nodier, the 1846 edition, which means they are easily in the public domain due to age. This one comes from https://www.oldbookillustrations.com/illustrations/golden-dream/ where they claim it is called "The Golden Dream" (or, rather Le songe d’or), which is the title of the next story after Trilby in Contes. But I think they got the image identification wrong. I haven't found the 1846 edition, but I did find the 1859 edition scanned in Google Books, which also has all these illustrations, especially this one on page 28 which is still inside Trilby. I believe that it's pretty clearly an illustration of Dougal the fisherman and Jeanie his (debatably faithful) wife, finding the jeweled casket with their fishing boat, which is an important part of Trilby. Here, for example, p. 67 of the first translation. It is in no way an illustration of any part of The Golden Dream, which can be found translated here, and which is about some golden coins spread beneath a poisonous Upas tree that are stumbled upon by a succession of male travelers (and a lizard and an angel) - there is no casket, no boat, and especially no woman anywhere in that story. Do you agree? --GRuban (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Here is the 1846 version. The image is in the same place as in the edition you found, clearly within Trilby. You can probably use it as a source for identification on Commons. Ffranc (talk) 13:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ! Once more unto the breach ... --GRuban (talk) 13:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

On a slightly more related matter, I and another editor have been writing User:GRuban/Maria Berlinska, about another Ukrainian woman warrior. I'm guessing you might have many of the same objections to it as you had to Yulia Tolopa and for the same reasons - or maybe not, since it may address the coverage she got sufficiently? Anyway, I'm being proactive, and asking for your objections before pushing it to mainspace. --GRuban (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Just be careful with everything that portrays someone as a war hero (especially when the sources are published during the war), gives an impression of romantic adventure, or comes off as a personal story rather than something relevant for the general public. Ffranc (talk) 12:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Trilby, ready to go
OK, I think I've mostly written it. It's a much more interesting story than I thought it would be! Please review, User:GRuban/Trilby. Specific issues you may want to address: Thank you! This was fun! --GRuban (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The title; I found 4 English language translations, two call it Trilby, the Fairy of Argyll (one with and one without the comma), and two just Trilby. None say "Imp". I would just call it Trilby if I could, but that's the title of a mostly unrelated book (which, in fact, sparked the first two translations! hilarious! that will probably be the DYK hook...), so I think our article title should be Trilby, the Fairy of Argyll, rather than ... Imp ...
 * Images. Did I say I like images? I found more beautiful images than I can fit in the article, between ballets and illustrations. Do you think some should go? I can add even more to be honest. Which should be the lead image?
 * Analysis. I only found one good analysis source, so the Analysis section is a bit flapping in the wind, but yet I don't think our article is really complete without such a section. Can you find another?
 * Publication history. I couldn't find a source that gives a comprehensive publication history; though I can easily find half a dozen publications in Google Books during Nodier's lifetime. Should I just list them?
 * Style tweaks - I don't do style, my writing is choppy at best, always has been. It does contain the facts, but without beauty. If you can make the text flow in a few of the worst places, I'll be obliged. And a second pair of eyes is always welcome.
 * I'm fine with any of the titles. I think I got Imp from this edition, not entirely sure though. The subtitle can work as a natural disambiguation but a parenthesis works too, and the primary topic is the hat in either case. I'll try to find some analysis, but probably not in a while. It could be worth mentioning that Nodier in his preface considered it to be separate from romanticism ("No one is more willing than I am to agree that the romantic school is a very bad school"). I would also recommend against using "fantasy" as genre label, as it is anachronistic, associated with conventions from British literature, and can create confusion with the romantic distinction between fancy/fantasy and imagination. "Literary fairy tale" could work, if there is no better term in the sources, or just novella. Ffranc (talk) 12:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ! Literary fairy tales is a redirect, but better than nothing so I used it instead of fantasy. I'm afraid I kept the mention of Romanticism as if this isn't a prime example of the school then nothing is. Charles Nodier is clearly described in his article as a major figure of the movement, so methinks his objection in that preface is a case of doth protest too much, and/or the natural tendency of creative types to resist being categorized. Was Edouard Manet an Impressionist? But his comment could certainly be useful to mention in an expanded Analysis section, if there was more than one source for it. And I'm still uncomfortable with not putting in a publishing history, but don't really have a secondary source for it. All that said - pushed live! I think it may not be GA quality or anything, but easily DYK quality, so that's what I'll go for. --GRuban (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Moondog (1956 album)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Moondog (1969 album)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC) the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC) the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Delphica
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC) the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Moondog (1969 album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moondog (1969 album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DadOfTheYear2022 -- DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Moondog (1969 album)
The article Moondog (1969 album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Moondog (1969 album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DadOfTheYear2022 -- DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

A toast sandwich for you!

 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eyvindur P. Eiríksson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folktale. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Zorian Dołęga-Chodakowski
Hello! Your submission of Zorian Dołęga-Chodakowski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ykraps (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Vincent Munier
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Zorian Dołęga-Chodakowski
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Eyvindur P. Eiríksson
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Binggrae Logo
Hey @Ffranc I moved the discussion here because my DYK submission has been approved now : D. I'm pretty sure the old binggrae logo doesn't violate copyright or the threshold of originality as I found it on namu wiki with the caption that says "it's too simple to be copyright". Most other pictures on that wiki have a caption saying its under limited use and copyrighted, but this one doesn't. I think it'll be ok to use it what do you think? Haiiya (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not an expert on this at all. But it does have more than just letters and geometrical shapes, and I don't think it's less distinct than some of the examples of protected images listed here. It's ultimately a question for Wikimedia Commons (possibly this discussion page?), but I know little about the nuances and standard procedures here, so I just removed it from the article for now to be on the safe side. Ffranc (talk) 12:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Sacrifice of Iphigenia
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your opinion about an article you were interested in
Hello Ffranc,

I think your expression of an opinion here would be useful for the further development of the article about Roman Neopaganism.--Æo (talk) 00:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * As an aside, I have also seen your well written article about Zorian Dołęga-Chodakowski. Your opinion would also be appreciated here, where a user who produces haphazardly written or translated articles like this one claims that some articles pertaining to Slavic Native Faith are "fringe" and should be deleted.--Æo (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Posted a response about the Slavic articles. I'll pass on the Roman discussion for now, because I don't know what a good, stable title would be, and I don't think it's meaningful to keep moving articles around. I've thought about expanding and rewriting polytheistic reconstructionism and eclectic Paganism (and perhaps merge them into one article, since most sources describe them as a continuum), which might help the discussion. But I've yet to find the motivation to do it and the sources I've read so far aren't that great. Ffranc (talk) 10:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I think that polytheistic reconstructionism and eclectic Paganism should be merged into modern Paganism. I remember that I myself proposed such merger a few years back, and, as I wrote on that occasion, both concepts seem to have been invented on some internet websites and not to be used by real Pagan communities.--Æo (talk) 12:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * They've been used from time to time in various ways, both by organised practitioners and scholars. There are enough sources to support at least a shared article; there are for example five pages about it in Michael Strmiska's Modern Paganism in World Cultures (18-22). But I haven't found any good source that talks about the histories of the terms. Strmiska only talks about the perceived conflict between different approaches. It would be more interesting to outline how the discourse originated and where and when it has been prominent. Fernando Pessoa used the term "reconstruction" in the 1910s and seemed to be ambivalent about it - one of his alter egos used it in a positive manner, another in a dismissive ("Neopaganism" in The Selected Prose of Fernando Pessoa, Grove Press 2001) - but I haven't seen any scholar bring that up. Ffranc (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It would be indeed interesting to outline where the distinction originated (in the West, as in Eastern Europe such demarcation does not seem to exist) and the history of the two terms, which are, however, generic and may refer to different religions, not only to strictly "Pagan" ones (in Merriam-Webster's definition this term strictly defines "European and Middle-Eastern pre-Christian/pre-Islamic religions"), and in any case are not universally used among Pagans (for instance, in Eastern Europe the term "reconstructionism" refers to historical reenactment without any religious/spiritual meanings, according to the sources I have read about modern Paganism in that region). What is sure is that in their current wretched state the two articles would perform a better function if merged into the main article, where a well written section (Midnightblueowl's work from a few years ago) treats the distinction and the two terms (and alternative ones as well) on the basis of scholarly sources.--Æo (talk) 18:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
 * Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hearken to the Witches Rune
  M ANdARAX       XAЯAbИA M    15:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Roman traditional movement
The image in the entry "Roman Traditional Movement" is identical to that of the other wikis, for example of "Via romana agli dei", from this it can be deduced that they correspond, in fact even their title is similar. Instead there is no entry in the other wikis whose title corresponds to "reconstructionist Roman religion".--Paroll (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The article on the Roman Traditional Movement is clearly about the organisation with that name, regardless of what images are used there or in other articles. You have to go by what the articles describe; if a title is flawed, that's a separate issue. Ffranc (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ffranc

Thank you for creating Procession in Lace.

User:CollectiveSolidarity, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belarusian modern Pagans


A tag has been placed on Category:Belarusian modern Pagans indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 06:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Modern Paganism in Belarus


A tag has been placed on Category:Modern Paganism in Belarus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ossian D'Ambrosio
Hello! Your submission of Ossian D'Ambrosio at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Aoidh (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to let you know I've left another message there at the DYK, thanks. - Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! Ffranc (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ffranc. Thank you for creating Otto Sigfrid Reuter. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Leiv Eirikson Discovering America
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ossian D'Ambrosio
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Zeitlaich
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
 * Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
 * Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
 * PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
 * Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
 * Pirate Flag of Jack Rackham.svg Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
 * Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
 * Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
 * Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)