User talk:Fhritp69

Speedy deletion nomination of Austin Penisa


A tag has been placed on Austin Penisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person   on Noah Cyrus, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Demi Moore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Allie DiMeco. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at James Wolk. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm Lucas Thoms. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Shailene Woodley, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; Lucas Thoms 03:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eva Mendes with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥   06:16, 11 July 2014 (UTC)