User talk:Ficusulmic

Hello, Ficusulmic, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately, your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Romanian; did you know there is a Romanian Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Bună ziua Ficusulmic, și bine ați venit pe Wikipedia! În timp ce eforturile de a îmbunătăți Wikipedia sunt întotdeauna binevenite, din păcate, contribuțiile dumneavoastră nu sunt scrise într-o engleză care să fie suficient de bună pentru a fi utilă. Se pare că sunteți mai familiarizat(ă) cu limba română; știai că există o Wikipedia în limba română? Ați putea prefera să contribuiți acolo în loc. În orice caz, bun venit la proiect, și vă mulțumesc pentru eforturile dvs.! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Ficusulmic, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ficusulmic


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ficusulmic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 🔥 Yes I'mOnFire 🔥( ContainThis Ember? ) 11:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ultrakill Network


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ultrakill Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. AntiDionysius ( talk ) 17:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello Ficusulmic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ficusulmic. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. AntiDionysius ( talk ) 17:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello AntiDionysius,
 * Thank you for your message and for bringing this issue to my attention. I want to clarify that my intention was only to create a draft, not to directly edit or publish any content related to the subject. When I created the draft, I selected the option stating that "I'm not related to the subject" and did not choose the "paid to edit" option, as I am not receiving any compensation for my contributions.
 * I understand the importance of transparency and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, and I appreciate your vigilance in maintaining the integrity of the platform. If there are specific areas in my draft that raise concerns or if you have any advice on how I can improve it to align better with Wikipedia's standards, I would greatly appreciate your guidance.
 * Please let me know how I can address any issues and ensure that my contributions are in compliance with Wikipedia's policies.
 * Thank you for your understanding and assistance.
 * Best regards, Ficusulmic (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are not the person you write about called "Ficusulmic" then your username is misleading, so you should not be editing from that username. JBW (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)