User talk:Fiddlinbeau

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at White nigger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

It's current usage. Sorry, you have to get over it. The term is racist in the first place. It's why I looked it up: but it didn't have the current definition from what I am hearing out on the streets. So deal.... I am reminded of the saying those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Perhaps it belongs in the Urban dictionary. Being politically correct is usually not correct, especially in this day and age. The definition remains and you will soon see because these things spread, just like the Coronavirus. Fiddlinbeau (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your comment about glass houses. Are you saying that I'm a white nigger because I removed your edit?
 * We don't edit Wikipedia articles based on what editors claim to have heard on the street. We edit based on what reliable sources say. I suggest that you read WP:OR and WP:RS. Meters (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, it is easy to see why you have your panties in a bunch. It wasn't that way at all. I'm saying that the topic is sensitive to begin with and we don't get to determine how it is used. In other words black people don't get to determine how the n word is used When they have to bear the brunt of it. Likewise, in Chicago, this is common parlance. A white nigger is a racist white person. White people don't like the n word so the blacks here call them now by their own n word with the qualifier "white" in front of it. They know that the whites don't like that, so they use it in order to drive the point home. Can you see their argument? I think they have a valid one. But you took it personally. That means you were not professional about this. You turned it into an opinion in your mind. And the usage is not based upon "reliable sources" because there is no such thing as this day and age. It is straight street talk. I spend a lot of time on the south side of Chicago doing volunteer work. It's why I looked up the word in the first place. When I realized it did not include their usage, which is quite reliable, then I decided to add it. You took it personally. Frankly I could care less because I have no attachment to this. This is more of an issue for you than anybody.... well, also the Republicans. Now you can tell me if that fits for your description or not, but I could care less. In fact, just don't answer back. I'm tired of Wikipedia Nazis not wanting to deal with realities beyond their own as ethnocentric beliefs. Last time I checked, they are still getting out doctoral diplomas in anthropology over such issues. Fiddlinbeau (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.''Your attitude to other editors on this page, plus your assertion that you should be free to insert whatever uncited content you wish to because you happen to experience in one city in the world is not the way we do things on Wikipedia. If you wish to continue editing here, you do need to follow our policies and conventions. If you wish to jump on a soap box and express your own opinions, you are certainly free to do so, but this is an encyclopaedia based which collates what other reliably published sources have written about, and you may not promote your own views or opinions here. Please also speak respectfully to other editors, even if in your own mind you choose to regard them (or maybe all of us) as Wikipedia Nazis. That attitude to others is not acceptable.'' Nick Moyes (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Important notices
You will be topic banned from these areas of the encyclopedia, without further warning, if you continue to violate Wikipedia's policies, such as the policy against original research, the policy about biographies of living persons and the policy for a neutral point of view. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors and to prevent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)