User talk:Fidelecourt

A page you started (Gaspar Enriquez) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gaspar Enriquez, Fidelecourt!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Uovo
Hi, I'm Vexations. Fidelecourt, thanks for creating Uovo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article does not include much of the critical analysis from the sources it cites. Art for Money’s Sake for example is used to cite "advanced cataloguing and indexing" but does not go into what the impact of these systems is in the way art is collected, which is what is so interesting about the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Tobolowsky


The article George Tobolowsky has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No claim to notability under WP:CREATIVE, does not meet notability guidelines at WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 04:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)