User talk:Fifigibbins

The article Realbuzz.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Please take a look at WP:WEB to see our guidelines for notability of websites. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Realbuzz.com


A tag has been placed on Realbuzz.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
Please note that Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, cannot accept articles about companies or other entities that do not meet minimal inclusion guidelines. It is not enough that your company exists: you must also show that it has been the subject of non-trivial coverage in third-party references generally deemed reliable. Hope this helps you understand the deletion rationale. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Thank you very much for taking the time to reply. I will see what I can do. Fiona

June 2010 (http://spam.realbuzz.com)
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MER-C 10:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you let me know why all the links to blogs have been taken down?
 * See above: "you should avoid or exercise great caution when ... linking to the ... website of your organization". It goes without saying that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting redbuzz.com. MER-C 05:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

i felt that having read your guidelines on links to external websites that links to a individuals blog that provides insightful information should be Ok. The blogs are written by the individuals and are not a way of promoting realbuzz.com. In the terms of linking stated on Wikipedia it asks -  Is the site content accessible to the reader - yes. Is the site content proper in the context of the article - yes. Is the link functional? Yes. I would really appreciate a fuller response as I have read all your guidelines and felt that this should be accepted as a external link. Thanks for your help. FG


 * What makes the links inappropriate is that you, on behalf of Realbuzz, added links to realbuzz.com. I won't object if someone not affiliated with Realbuzz reverts me. My concern, given that you have made no other edits except relating to Realbuzz and your role in the company, is that you are using Wikipedia as a means for promotion. Therefore, I strongly recommend you make some edits completely unrelated to Realbuzz. MER-C 13:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)