User talk:FifthCrack

Speedy deletion of FifthCrack
A tag has been placed on FifthCrack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Menti  fisto  09:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Policies regarding articles
The article FifthCrack has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seemed to be blatant advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on promotion as well as the Business' FAQ for more information. Phrases like "If you want to help them" and "why dont you try for your self" are inherently promotional and do not belong in an encyclopedia article.

An article on this topic would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies and the notability guidelines on web material. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website&mdash;these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable.

If you are able to assemble necessary sources to assert notability, you may certainly recreate the article, although if you are closely associated with the subject, you should read our conflict of interest guideline. Articles must be written neutrally and without undue promotion.

Help:Starting a new page should give you all the guidance you need to get it going, but you might also look at Your first article and How to write a great article. Please consider taking a tour through the Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation.

If you have any questions about this, please feel free to leave a note at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)