User talk:Fig daisy

Matthew Fabisch
Hello Fig daisy,

This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to make a slight addition to your article backed by references. I hope you'd like my little effort. I'd appreciate your say on this. Best regards,   (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC))

Doreen Costa
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Doreen Costa, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/representatives/Costa/Pages/Biography.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * This page is not in the public domain. It clearly says "©2012 State of Rhode Island General Assembly" at the bottom. It is true that works of the US federal government are in the public domain, but this does not apply to the works of state governments. Hut 8.5 15:10, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Fabisch


The article Matthew Fabisch has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable lawyer and probate judge. Seems to be a vanity page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Noah  05:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)