User talk:FiggyBee

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:
 * some General guidance.
 * Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
 * Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).
 * Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary
 * Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
 * Take a look at Consensus of standards
 * Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, -- Alf melmac 14:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

reasoning behind my edits, for the benefit of Captain scarlet
Comments? I'm willing to work with you if you're willing to work with me.


 * If we can talk in 'private' on what either of us believe the Trainz article can look like and contain let's do it here (or on my talk page. Captain scarlet 13:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Sock Puppets
Stop creating sock puppets for your AFD for Dukey. It is a big no-no. ---J.Smith 06:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I have not created sock puppets, I have not voted on the AFD, and indeed I have never edited the article in question. I was asked by David_VI to clarify a point in the AFD, and I did so. FiggyBee 06:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Guild of Play, Guild of the Poor Brave Things
Thanks for flagging the issues. I was working too fast, and wikied the artcles thinking I had also edited them. Mea culpa.

The articles themselves contain infomration thatwoudl leave a significant gap if they vanished (the reason I created them, albeit poorly) in the first place.

If you check revision history you will see that they have now been edited throroughly. This is flagged on each article's discussion page, too.

If you think any further edits are required let's work together to get them right rather than leave two gaps.

I think wiki etiquette is now that you, if satisfied, removed the speedy delete tag? My suggestion is that you remove it anyway since you can always reinstate it, and we discuss any outstanding issues.

Fiddle Faddle 15:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello
How do I quite you? MegaloManiac 18:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well quite. FiggyBee 01:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Baby dont be that way. MegaloManiac 07:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

ATF changes
Thank you for your recent editorial changes to the ATF entry. Blondlieut 01:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

A friendly Howdily doodly
I saw your user page and decided to drop by a friendly hello! Born Acorn 15:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message at my discussion page. I am still learning to communicate across Talk Pages. I replied to your message. Please go there to see the reply if you have not already done do. I wish you good luck in your efforts in Wikipedia. Respectfully, Armycaptain 00:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

'inaccurate calculation'
I'm not sure if you did the math or not, but 93.25 feet is in fact 28.42 m. The anonymous editor of de Havilland Canada Dash 8 was absolutely correct. ericg &#9992; 01:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Not sure what I was smoking. ericg &#9992; 01:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, no probs, happens to the best of us. FiggyBee 09:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Rufus Barr's page
I hadn't finished updating it FiggyBee.

I urge you to look again and notice that I do IN FACT, meet the requirements. I will thank you to refrain from conversing with me directly again. Stop trying to play Wiki God and perhaps find a life. Also, get your facts right, pal. Rufus Barr is not me, he is an entirely different person, but as he is my favourite comedian and I am yet to see anything about him up here, he deserves a page. Just because you've never heard of him, doesn't mean he isn't well known.

Thank you and good day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fufus84 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC).


 * Replied on user's talk page. FiggyBee 04:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Porngata
Please don't add speeddy delete notices to articles already at AfD. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 12:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I wasn't sure whether I could or not given that I was the nom for the AfD in the first place. FiggyBee 14:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No, no-one can (an admin can close the AfD as a speedy deletion. I was in two minds, but in the end dcided that it didn't quite count). --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 14:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. I shall remember that. FiggyBee 14:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

The Shiny Diamonds controversy
Hi FiggyBee, this is Leigh... the guy who created The Shiny Diamonds controversy article. I thought I'd let you know that I am certainly not Tim, nor am I in the Band "the Shiny Diamonds". In fact I don't even really like their music. I'm simply a guy who did a Wikipedia search on them after I read a really good article by David Segal in the Washington Post. It seems to me that many people (bloggers in particular) are doing the same thing. Only when we get to Wikipedia we find that the information we want has been deleted! How sad is that. I'm fundamentally against deleting information that people want. Do you know of any way to find out how many people do a Wikipedia search on "The Shiny Diamonds"? Thank you. Leigh8959 15:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Leigh. I didn't mean to suggest you, the creator of the article, were Tim; my comment was in reference to quotes from the Post article.  While I am generally an inclusionist, I also don't think wiki should become a collection of indiscriminate information, and having articles based solely on a single op-ed piece in a newspaper (even if those op-eds are about wikipedia) seems a bit over the top.  There's no (verifiable) information the wiki article could contain that's not in the original Post article.


 * Anyway, to answer your question, I think it is possible to find out how many views a given article has, since there are scripts that show the top 100 pages.  I wouldn't know how to get the stats for a particular page though, and I don't think that knowing how many views the page has would be worthwhile anyway, as popularity is not a reason for keeping the article, and the numbers are likely to be inflated greatly by the fact it is listed at AfD. FiggyBee 00:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

911 Conspiracy Theories/Alternative Theories
Why dont we focus on identifying individual points of objection at Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories instead of having long winded debates that cover 2 or 3 subjects The we we know everyones objections either way, we can work out a compromise on each point with a view to reaching a consensus. "Snorkel | Talk" 09:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup tags
Hi, when using cleanup tags, such as "confsing" "cleanup" "wikify", it's best not to subst them. See WP:SUBST for more info. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 20:18 24 December 2006 (GMT).

Queensland shires
Please see my closing comments at Talk:Pine Rivers Shire Council. I'll notify WP:AUS as well. Duja ► 09:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks Duja. I'll look in at WP:AUS and take up the discussion there. FiggyBee 14:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryan
I'm Ryan and I want a page about myself so eat it Aussie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liver Lips (talk • contribs).

Shinobido
Hi, FiggyBee. Thanks for adding your opinion, but I'm afraid the only reason I did it the way I did is because I'm not all that familiar with how Wikipedia's more intricate edits work. Frankly, I don't have a clue. About 90% of the history on the page is everything I've added and a couple of vandalisms or innappropriate remarks that I've removed. If you know how to make the changes and would like to do so, please feel free to go right ahead. Gamer Junkie 01:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep, I am doing that now. :) Cheers, FiggyBee 01:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Good to see it's all taken care of.  I was actually in the process of typing a message for you asking if you'd maybe forgotten.  Looks like you haven't though.  Cheers. Gamer Junkie 10:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Smile!


Here's some Penguins for you! Penguins somehow in their own strange way promote WikiLove and hopefully these Penguins have made your day seem even better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing!  Crested Penguin 09:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Chien-Sung Waak
Hey there. Don't take my replacing your speedy personally. I'd rather that nonsense went down the right way than having it survive on a technicality. G1 specifically excludes hoaxes, so I didn't want to take any chance. :-) Coren 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh hey, not a problem. FiggyBee 03:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Blanking User:Michael Shrimpton
I see you blanked User:Michael Shrimpton as a BLP violation. I'm pretty sure the page was created by Michael himself, which you can fairly easily verify yourself. As it is a user page, it typically contains a biography of that user. Mine is one such example. I'm restoring the content. Maury 20:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I notice there was some vandalism at the end of the page that suggests it was not written in the first-person. Removed. Maury 20:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I did check the history of the page and none of it was written by User:Michael Shrimpton. Even if it is his own work, it's hardly a typical user biography, and I'd say it fails points 2,3,4, 5 and 7 of WP:SELFPUB.  However, it's not something I feel strongly about, so I'll bow to your judgement. :) FiggyBee 08:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Bradman
Thanks for helping. Further intervention welcomed! --Dweller 09:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Swindley (moved from User:FiggyBee)
STOP DELETING SWINDLEY PAGE, Thanks x —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mosler64 (talk • contribs). 16:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

aurora
though you did it last year, thanks for clarifying the bit about the Fighters Anthology campaign. I was just an anon then. Eaglestorm (talk) 06:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ray_ellington.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ray_ellington.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fnspr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fnspr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

de Havilland Gipsy Moth
I have been expanding this article and working on format and references. A user on the talk page proposed to rename the article de Havilland DH.60 Moth which I think is very sensible as then all the variants of the DH.60 (Moth, Gipsy Moth, Cirrus Moth, Hermes Moth, Genet Moth, Metal Moth etc) can be included but I see that this article name has been used for a single variant. There has been similar discussion on that article talk page. A discussion on this can be viewed at where it has been been recommended that the content of de Havilland Gipsy Moth and de Havilland DH.60 Moth be preserved and merged in to the latter article. With many variants it is clear that the DH.60 is a series of the same basic type that can be covered in one article. I have been asked as a courtesy to inform involved editors in case there are strong objections. Many thanks.Nimbus227 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes but....
If I write my question on the talk page of these boys ... I will have 0 answers. I don't know if you are right. I think I can want to debate on reference desk page. I'm sure you are a fan of Iran and that you hate my country Israel. You are an Anti-Semite. Ahmed987147 (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You can want to debate on the Refdesk, but it says in big letters up the top Do not start debates or post diatribes. The reference desk is not a soapbox. Sorry. If you want to get more people to the discussion, look through the article's history and find people who might be interested, then post on their user talks.  Or maybe you can find wp:wikiprojects which would be interested. FiggyBee (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

What shall we do to clean up the Dunny Discussion Page?
First off, thank you very much for teaching me about Disambiguation. The Jim Smith example was very helpful. I was looking over the discussion you proposed on whether to merge Dunny/Munny under Kidrobot and realized that my side talk on the making of the page was probably getting in the way of the main goal of the discussion page. It seems the goal was to discuss the shift. Shall we erase the discussion we had so that we can free that space up for the intended discussion? Is this talk page the appropriate place to ask this? Thank you for bearing with me on this learning, editing, and history making adventure.Humboldtbettie (talk) 09:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It's no problem just leaving our conversation there; sometimes conversations get sidetracked, and there's no lack of space for other discussions. FiggyBee (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm really sorry
I have been agressive when I said: You are an Anti-Semite and yo are a fan of Iran. I'm Israeli and I hate Iran, for this I thought that you were defending Iran when you removed my question from the reference desk. Forgive me, I'm not agressive. I'm sorry. OK?. Forgive me. Are we OK? Ahmed987147 (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It's okay. FiggyBee (talk) 01:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Garlic?
The possibility seems remote, but... Xn4  09:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Garlic? FiggyBee (talk) 11:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you click the link, FiggyBee, it takes you to Garlic/Superstition and mythology. Xn4  01:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. I still don't get it. :) FiggyBee (talk) 03:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The sting is in the tail. Xn4  23:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Flying Scotsman (train) centenary poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Flying Scotsman (train) centenary poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Dunny (Slang)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Dunny (Slang), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Verification of my Identity (Francis gary Powers, Jr.
Please respond to my talk page so I know you have answered.

Hello. Can you confirm that you are Francis Gary Powers Jr.? I have added a template to the article's talk page to that effect, but I'd like to make sure. FiggyBee (talk) 04:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I am not sure if this is where I am supposed to answer. Send me an email to gpowersjr@coldwar.org and or call me at the museum 703-273-2381 and I will reply. You can verify that I am the founder of The Cold War Musuem and that should do it. I would be glad to send you a copy of my resume or photo once I have heard from you by email.

I would laso like to confirm that my changes to Francis Gary Powers, Francis Gary Powers, Jr, and Cold War Museum over the last few days will be accepted for inclusion.

Please advise. Thanks, Francis Gary Powers, Jr.

Edit Wars
FiggyBee, thank you for your help and clarification of edits and edit wars. I deleted my original comments because on closer examination I alleviated my concerns with a few minor edits and citations.

I am still trying to get the hang of this.

Gpowersjr —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpowersjr (talk • contribs) 17:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

get off your kick
You need to get off your kick of deleting my questions and responses to questions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.11.124 (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Name meaning
Didnt know if you were still paying attention to the ref desk subject, but it stands for The Juggalo Resurection. i spelled resurection wrong, i know, but im not sure thats a good enough reason to get a username change.the juggreserection IstKrieg! 13:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Holy Shxt!! they actually changed it!the juggresurection IstKrieg! 20:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Indira Naidoo
You are quite right - I don't know what I was thinking. I've reverted my edits and apologized to the editor. Canadian Monkey (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Gary Powers
Hi,

I've reverted your changes to the Gary Powers article - firstly, because such a rename should be discussed first, and secondly because simply cutting-and-pasting the article is not the correct way to move an article, as it loses the page history. FiggyBee (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I counter that I am correcting a major oversight that has already been discussed in the article... Check-Six (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I wasn't disputing the move so much as the way it was moved. The article had now been moved correctly by user:Parsecboy... FiggyBee (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Livingstone
Well if it wasn't called my suggestion, it wasn't called "Zambia" until independence, surely? Can you reply on my talk page? Thanks Speedboy Salesman (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clearing that up. I don't know about using a "current country" though, because, really, the country didn't actually exist at the time. Speedboy Salesman (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I think in the infobox it should now "now Zambia" Speedboy Salesman (talk) 10:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

You wrote…

 * I've reverted User:Ian Wilkinson's edit (which was really mostly a revert to older versions of the page), based on the concerns already raised by people here. The source of his information on what 'neo-prohibitionists' believe is this website, which is funded by an alcohol marketing organisation. It doesn't exactly read as a fair and even-handed statement that there are people who think alcohol causes problems in our society. FiggyBee 03:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

in Talk:Neo-prohibitionism

What's the evidence for Hanson's funding? (I notice he didn't deny it.) Nunquam Dormio (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow, this is going back a bit. If you click the "disclaimer" link at the bottom of Hanson's site it goes to a page which says "The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, Inc. provided an unrestricted grant that was used to fund this web site". FiggyBee (talk) 13:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I never looked there. He's used his grant to spread Wikipedia copiously with links to his site: see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Barbaby
Oops :D Timeshift (talk) 06:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
...for your input here regarding my question on aircraft callsigns. Much appreciated. 70.122.36.93 (talk) 05:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Brisbane mayors
Hi, do I know you? If you're in the Brisbane area, then yes it probably is me since my name isn't that common. I actually think I may have completed the list of mayors, but as the Brisbane City Archives only lists the year of their mayoralty and not the exact beginning and end dates, it's hard to be 100% sure they are a contiguous list. I am now working my way through creating pages for each mayor -- currently working on James Swan, who I discovered was one of the founders of the Moreton Bay Courier, so I got a bit distracted updating the Courier-Mail Wikipedia page to add in some history of it, since it's intertwined with James Swan's history. Kerry (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * We met a few times a few years ago; my brother Michael is an aficionado of a certain brick. :) FiggyBee (talk) 05:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I had assumed you were probably someone I knew through family/local history (given the interest in mayors of Brisbane) -- I hadn't considered a Lego connection :) Kerry (talk) 09:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Flogging a dead horse
Made the move from 'beating' as per various discussions on the talk page, in which you took part in favour of the move. -- Ishel99 (talk) 02:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Yo Mama
Wow, I clicked on the "your Mom" link on your page, and practically read the whole article. Time to test them out on my friends! Mwah ha ha ha! Thanks. Moptopstyle1 (&quot;I Feel Fine.&quot;) (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Nissan Pathfinder
Elsewhere it's consider a car? Really? Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes. Really. FiggyBee (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for helping me get more information on those bus pictures for the descriptions. I have added descriptions to all of them, if you want to look and maybe alter if you feel I got it wrong somewhere :) Chevymontecarlo . 15:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Stupid?
Figgy, was it me you were referring to as stupid?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Moved your reply
Just to let you know, I moved you reply so it is above Bilby's one as I believe that is where it should be based do indenting. Given the collapse box which I didn't add, it was rather confusing in the old location. It may have been an automatically resolved EC or you may not have noticed where you were replying but the location was intentional, it's generally wise, as recommended by Indentation to ensure your reply is in line with whatever you are replying to (in othe words, the indentation matches the location), even if that means you post it above what's an older response which is replying to an earlier comment or the OP directly. Nil Einne (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Francis Gary Powers Jr. for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Francis Gary Powers Jr., which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Francis Gary Powers Jr. until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Victor Victoria (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Broomhall


The article John Broomhall has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP. No significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Collective


A tag has been placed on The Collective requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Flyinghutchinsons.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flyinghutchinsons.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Hide box
I put the box around it because I thought that was the correct thing to do with unhelpful comments that detracted from the section but weren't outright vandalism. I'm sorry if that was not the correct thing to do. I have now removed the comment. Thank you. Sleeper4545454545 (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Parachuteworks.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Parachuteworks.png

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Broomhall


A tag has been placed on John Broomhall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. j⚛e deckertalk 17:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Braypark.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Source for File:Jbchandler.jpg
In an ongoing attempt to add metadata to media resources on Wikipedia this file was identified as potentially missing a source, It would be appreciated if you could consider adding one.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Jbchandler.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Jbchandler.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WZ-9


The article WZ-9 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No coverage for the subject; fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  14:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

"Coal trucks" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coal trucks. Since you had some involvement with the Coal trucks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Jbchandler.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jbchandler.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Jbchandler.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jbchandler.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Numspan33 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)