User talk:Filipeuni

January 2016
Please read WP:EXT and WP:SPAM. Your external link additions that I have checked so far have not been appropriate. Meters (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Please also read WP:Minor. Content changes are not minor edits.Meters (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --John (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

I will let another admin review this latest unblock request. To help you, as a general rule, it is better not to edit subjects one is in a relationship with. You say "our" above; are you an employee of Univision? --John (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks John, your response is the friendliest of the communications I've received other than the original editor "Meters". I do think my appeals have been met with extreme prejudice honestly, and yes I am an employee trying to update old information for the most part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filipeuni (talk • contribs)


 * No worries. I am sure nobody is trying to be unfriendly but this is a fairly common situation and it is one we have established procedures for. You can read more at WP:COI but basically your best recourse would be to make a suggestion at a talk page or a project talk page, and let others implement it if they agree it is a good idea. For you to edit material on the company you work for would create an impression of conflict of interest, however harmless these edits might seem to you (and might indeed actually be). I would be happy to unblock you if you undertook not to make any more edits direct to articles relating to your employer. In return I will help to guide you how to make the necessary proposals and see if there is consensus to do them. As an extra reward, if you like there are another three million articles to edit which don't relate to your employer. You may find it highly rewarding as many of us have over the years. --John (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

John I agree then to not post directly and would appreciate your guidance in getting changes recommended in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filipeuni (talk • contribs) 13:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll try to check any requests you make too. If I remember correctly, many of your original edits were to add or modify external links to your company's pages on various shows. Even some of the existing links were pretty questionable. Meters (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Many of the older links were questionable and I believe I removed any duplicates or non-directly related ones. We've made massive sweeping changes to our sites in the last 6-14 months so I just wanted to update our links initially. You'll notice many of the ones before my edits were legacy, IE: channel.jhtml or content.jhtml plus parameters (which do not exist now and may not be mapped for a redirect). I appreciate your concern and assistance in keeping wiki quality and relevance as high as possible.
 * What I meant by "questionable" was that some of the existing external links pointing to your site should probably not be included in the articles at all. Meters (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)