User talk:Filmgoer/Archive 3

Muthu GAR
Could you please return to it? I addressed some of your comments. Kailash29792 (talk)  17:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Great progress. There's now only 1 suggestion (in #Production) that needs to be addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Could you please find a way to paraphrase the quote about the shooting of "Thilllana Thillana"? That way we may not need to cite the same source twice. Kailash29792 (talk)  03:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

CURLY
I didn't see your talk page post until you mentioned one was left in your complaint, so a report I feel is unfair or unwarranted given I wasn't aware you had an issue raised. My talk has eben getting swamped with automated notices about soon to be outdated drafts so it probably got buried. Regardless I'll ensure my edits abide with guidelines, please pull your complaint. Rusted AutoParts 21:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Meet the Woo
I wondering if you could review the GAN for Meet the Woo 2? You did a great job reviewing Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon. Shoot for the Stars 💫 (talk) 01:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop
Please Some Dude from North Carolina stop drafting so hastily and lazily. What you did here is already a shame, you directly created a blank draft. Right now you are the only one doing it that way. Start creating them with at least one reference or I will have to report your behavior. It's unfair to those of us who take the time to at least include an introduction and a reference and then find that you already created it in a lazy way. This is my last notice, next time I will have to report your behavior directly.  Bru no Va rgas  Eñe'ẽ avec moi 15:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your work reviewing Super Bowl Commercials! I really appreciate it!
 * JParksT2023 (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Degrassi Junior High
The majority of your comments on the review have been addressed, although I am still looking for an additional source for the books being reprinted in 2006. There is a source on ProQuest, but ProQuest isn't archivable and I cannot find a reproduction of said source elsewhere. As with the other concerns, I've removed that line. Archiving all the existing sources is going to be a tedious process because of how much there is (there is a good chunk that HAD to be archived however anyway). Does IABot (which I currently can't use because I need the 'analyzepage' permission) work for preemptive archiving? ToQ100gou (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Since the nom is close to being passed I've run the bot so you won't have to worry about archiving sources manually. Ping me back when the rest of the suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, so now I think I've addressed every suggestion. I've expanded the 'Awards and nominations' a bit and tried to make it avoid "In 1989, he won this award, in 1990 she won this award". As for "#Critical reception", maybe it could use some better wording, as I'm finding it slightly difficult to avoid wording it as "So and so said this, so and so said that". I've expanded some bits and added some more sources for said expanded bits, but now all those have to be archived. Other than that, I think I've addressed it all. ToQ100gou (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the review. ToQ100gou (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

GA reviews
Would you like to review Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story, and Yash Chopra (both are biographical books by the way) when an editor from the GOCE have edited it? --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 14:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure! But you might have to ping me again went GOCE edits them. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Ultraman draft
Thanks for filling so much out! I ran after the post and forgot to come back to it. Anyway, about the title, I was also confused at first since the base dab was open at Ultraman (film), but Ultraman (disambiguation) actually has three films listed already. I was going to move back without leaving a redirect since we're probably the only ones that know it's there right now. Any objection? -2pou (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No objection. I moved it. 16:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Breathing Happy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Breathing Happy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Superstore (season 6)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Superstore (season 6) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones (season 6)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Game of Thrones (season 6) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Joker (2019 film)
Hi, you seemed to forget to specify a reason for your revert. In the movie, Thomas abused Penny and (most likely) raped her, leaving her powerless to defend herself (I watched it again yesterday just to make sure I remembered it correctly). Since she had no money to hire decent lawyers to prosecute him, and no police responded to her plea, she decided to adopt Arthur in order to blackmail Thomas into believing that he was their child. However, she later grew attached to Arthur and started calling him "happy", especially since her boyfriend was beating him up. When Arthur was 7, her boyfriend got arrested for drug trafficking and was sentenced to 5 years in prison, but died the next year. So she raised "Happy" by herself, writing letters to Thomas for alimony until Thomas actually did some research and found out Arthur wasn't his son. The reason he did not lock her up in a mental institution instead is because he had pity for Penny. --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * A lot of your reasoning feels more like your interpretation of the film. The version most people saw was that Penny worked for Thomas and was mentally ill, resulting in a fabricated story between them. "Most likely" is not certain, and the plot should not include speculation because there weren't any clear signs that "Thomas abused Penny and (most likely) raped her". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * All rich and influential people are portrayed as "bad guys" in that movie. You need RS? --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, share a source but we can not add speculation to the plot section. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Superstore (season 6)
The article Superstore (season 6) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Superstore (season 6) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

WP:NFF concerns
Hey! I have noticed that you are moving a lot of film articles out of draft space as soon as a scheduled film start date has passed. Per WP:NFF, "sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun." Please avoid bringing an article to the main space until you have a source dated after that start date that has confirmed shooting has begun. BOVINEBOY 2008 09:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones (season 6)
The article Game of Thrones (season 6) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Game of Thrones (season 6) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Superstore (season 6)
The article Superstore (season 6) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Superstore (season 6) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Murder of Bianca Devins - GA
Hi, I'm just checking that the review hasn't been put on hold. Thanks, anyway. DMT biscuit (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

GA
Remember two articles I asked you to review? They are on GA nominations now! --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous promo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous promo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Peer review/The 40-Year-Old Virgin/archive1
Care to leave any comments here given your work on film articles? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones (season 6)
The article Game of Thrones (season 6) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Game of Thrones (season 6) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

what did you want to talk about
I just saw you put something down in my user talk so what is it that you wanted to tell me Sarah afton (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You were vandalizing the Wiki-article Army of the Dead on May 29 . I reverted all of your edits and added a warning to your talk page to stop. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

ok Sarah afton (talk) 21:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

the next time I edit I'll make sure its reliable and is related to the article Sarah afton (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of The Baker (upcoming film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Baker (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Baker (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 21:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Breaking Bad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bowen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones (season 6)
The article Game of Thrones (season 6) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Game of Thrones (season 6) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Share (upcoming film)


The article Share (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Would redirect to the director if they had an article, but does not meet WP:NFILM."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

CE on Mahanati
Hi. Thanks for the review! May I ask why you added a comma here Special:Diff/1027696404. Isn't comma not used before an and? -- DaxServer (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Some variations of English use commas before an "and" (serial commas) so I added it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , though not mandatory, it is widely used. MOS:OXFORDCOMMA says "Editors may use either convention so long as each article is internally consistent." -- Ab207 (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Ab207 @Some Dude From North Carolina Thanks for the inputs. I never knew comma can legally come before an and, even outside Wikipedia 😳 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones (season 6)
The article Game of Thrones (season 6) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Game of Thrones (season 6) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 23:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brigsby Bear
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brigsby Bear you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KyleJoan -- KyleJoan (talk) 03:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brigsby Bear
The article Brigsby Bear you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brigsby Bear for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KyleJoan -- KyleJoan (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brigsby Bear
The article Brigsby Bear you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brigsby Bear for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KyleJoan -- KyleJoan (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Christian Bale FAC
Hi there Some Dude from North Carolina! I remember that you reviewed as a good article nominee, so I thought I'd let you know that I've expanded it a great deal and nominated it as a featured article candidate. I'm reaching out to see whether you would be interested in leaving comments on its nomination page since you've also contributed extensively to biographies and film articles. I see that you also have experience with featured lists, so any feedback you can give would be much appreciated. That said, please feel free not to comment on the nomination if the Bale article is no longer of interest to you. Thank you in advance! KyleJoan talk 05:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lighthouse (2019 film)
The article The Lighthouse (2019 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lighthouse (2019 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HumanxAnthro -- HumanxAnthro (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Re: Small comment
About the MOS, there's actually no issue with not using serial commas in such an instance, as long as it's internally consistent. There's no ambiguity in this sentence (It stars A, B and C.)

Regardless, please do not edit my talk page again. Thanks. -  DoubleCross  ( ‡ ) 19:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Editors may use either convention so long as each article is internally consistent. Meaning that if an article is using American English, serial commas should be used as long as there's no ambiguity. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Peer review
Hey! Just recently opened a peer review for Living in the Age of Airplanes, thought you might be interested in giving input.  Gerald WL  15:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swagger (TV series) (June 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swagger (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Swagger (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Swagger_(TV_series) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Swagger_(TV_series) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Some Dude From North Carolina. I'm just posting to let you know that M. Night Shyamalan filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 23. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 01:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Cry Macho (film)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Cry Macho (film) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN the tie comes.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Shape of Water
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Shape of Water you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Shape of Water
The article The Shape of Water you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Shape of Water for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 17:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Peer review
Hi there, hope you are doing fine. Expecting your valuable comments here. Thank you.-- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 05:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Times at the El Royale
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bad Times at the El Royale you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.--Akrasia25 (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Times at the El Royale
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bad Times at the El Royale you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Akrasia25 -- Akrasia25 (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Times at the El Royale
The article Bad Times at the El Royale you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad Times at the El Royale for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Akrasia25 -- Akrasia25 (talk) 21:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Shape of Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Kraus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jojo Rabbit
The article Jojo Rabbit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jojo Rabbit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. -- MSG17 (talk) 00:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Addams Family 2 (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Addams Family 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Addams Family 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Addams_Family_2 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Addams_Family_2 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Shape of Water
The article The Shape of Water you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Shape of Water for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

François Coignet/GA1

 * You have asked me to Archive sources. I'll be glad to do, but that one I don't know how to do. Can you get me started on this. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Here's a tool. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * After I ran the tool it said Links analyzed of 5 and 0 on everything else. I gave it the title page name of the article François Coignet. It did say Page modified:No Now what? Anything further I should do? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Is this a tool I should put on my Desktop for future article GANs? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I would recommend using it everywhere as archiving can prevent future readers from clicking a dead link. I ran the tool on the François Coignet article and it archived four sources so I guess it wasn't working before. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * O.K. I see where it archived 4 sources. It's a new tool for me. I will place the tool on my Desktop and will be running it on future GANs, to archive websites. Thanks for tool. I will work on the rest of the GAN issues tomorrow and should finish up then. Thanks for review and help.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * O.K. I placed the tool on my Desktop for future article GANs. I recently upgraded the article I created on Royal Page Davidson submitted GAN and ran the tool on it and it showed Rescuing 18 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8. Thanks for tool, looks like a very nice item to have.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Upcoming films categories
Hi there! When adding categories to upcoming films, please be sure to include Category:Upcoming films. I have noticed that several articles you have created and contributed to have included Category:Upcoming English-language films but not the former. It is a non-diffusing category, meaning that even if it is in a proper subcat, it should also be included. Thanks! BOVINEBOY 2008 16:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Synge Street CBS GA review
Thanks for taking on my first GA nomination at Synge Street CBS. It is much appreciated. Happy to answer any questions or implement any suggestions you may have. Fob.schools (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crawl (2019 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crawl (2019 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Exigency
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Exigency you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 02:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Exigency
The article The Exigency you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Exigency for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 03:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crawl (2019 film)
The article Crawl (2019 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crawl (2019 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Blu-ray.com
Hey, I just cited a professional Blu-ray review (not the database) in a reception section. I remember hearing that br.com is unreliable; does the professional review count? Cause WP:RSP doesn't seem to list it.  Gerald WL  04:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The site is unreliable per WP:RSP/BLURAY as information is "provided by its userbase and can be edited by anyone without any fact-checking". As a result, I don't recommend citing reviews from that website; try looking for reviews from reliable sources. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

FAC suggestion
Hi! Thanks for all the GANs of mine you've been picking up, much appreciated. I see you've grabbed another, London Hughes: To Catch a D*ck. If it's not outrageously cheeky, I'm trying to get a few eyeballs on another user's El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie FAC, which failed the last time just due to lack of attention. If I remember rightly, you've at least seen Better Call Saul, so I was wondering if you'd be interested in giving it a review if you find the time at some point. — Bilorv ( talk ) 15:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Marcelo Gallardo
Howdy! I noticed you took on my GAN regarding the article of Marcelo Gallardo. It's nice since I've been waiting for a long while. So, anyway, it's my first nomination in years (I'm kinda semi-retired) and I hope it's up to the current standarts, besides being my first one on a soccer coach. I'm thrilled to see if I pass it on the first attempt. Prepared to do the necessary improvements balancing it with my real-world life. Let's see where it leads!--Gunt50 (talk) 17:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Been working on the points you wrote on the nomination page. Seems like it's all done so far. Just check it out when you have the time.--Gunt50 (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

User abuses their power and makes their own justice
It is easy to win a trial when you are your own lawyer and judge. The vandalism page you so proudly link specifically mentions the concept of neutral point of view which is exactly the reason of my action on the Flaked page. Your paragraph and quote was expressly chosen to attack the show, with a biased and uncalled for commentary. Added to that the fact that critics quotes are always reserved for the "Reception" section of an article about a show, but you again chose with ill intent to showcase it in the article's summary to thwart the show's reputation. Finally, you revert this change on your own content, hiding behind a moderator's hat with your speech on my user page thinking I would not notice that you're the very same person who made this modification.

All in all, you show most of the signs of someone who really should not be allowed to have much power on something as important as wikipedia.
 * Are you okay? The notification I gave you was a template (Template:uw-vandalism2). If you believe the quote from Mary McNamara, which criticizes "white male adulthood" and is mentioned on the show's Rotten Tomatoes page under "Top Critics" is controversial or as you put it, "racist commentary", it can be replaced with the Rotten Tomatoes consensus, which calls it "dull and pointless". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Asheville

 * FYI, I used to live in Asheville from 1997 to 2003. My favorite tourist attraction was the Biltmore House -> we had yearly passes to it.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Paint It Black
Hi Some Dude From North Carolina, I know that I have just officially closed the PR for Paint It Black, but would you be willing to take a look and give your assessment with respect to FA (can be on that page, here, or really anywhere...just give a ping)? I'd love another opinion from someone as experienced as yourself. I greatly appreciate your help with and assessment of Red. -- The SandDoctor Talk 01:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Red PR
Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! -- The SandDoctor Talk 01:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Army of the Dead
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Army of the Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Halloween Kills
Hello, I just wanted to ask why on "Halloween Kills", you don't add "Kyle Richards, Nancy Stephens and Charels Cyphers"?. They are a part of this movie and I feel like their names should be up there with Anthony Michael Hall and the rest. I was just wanting to know. Roseyazz34 (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to add a source to verify they are part of the cast. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

There are sources that state they are in the movie. Have you checked that they are in the trailer, and also the actors and actresses confirmed this too. Roseyazz34 (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You can add them back. Just add a source with a template, such as . Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Army of the Dead
The article Army of the Dead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Army of the Dead for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 03:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Army of the Dead
The article Army of the Dead you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Army of the Dead for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 04:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Repeated link
Hello again. Do you think that means repeated multiple times in a table, or repeated once in a table after having already been linked in the article? It doesn't matter much to me either way but I am curious for future edits. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * "repeated multiple times in a table" Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * 👍 Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Casting announcements
Hey! I've noticed several editors doing this and I can't remember if I've pointed it out to you before or not. In this edit, you used the article's publication date in the sentence "In July, Zach Braff joined the cast." The article does not indicate that this actually happened in July, that is simply when the information was made available. It is more likely that Braff has been in the cast for longer but the studio has waited to release the information. It would be more accurate for the sentence to read "In July, THR reported that Braff had joined the cast." or something to that effect. Just some food for thought! BOVINEBOY 2008 17:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Earthquake reviews
Hi, thanks for picking up the three reviews. Please give me some time to respond. I'm right in the middle of my four-day work week and would like to tackle them when I get some time early next week. Dawnseeker2000 22:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Bad Times at the El Royale
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kidnap (2017 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kidnap (2017 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kidnap (2017 film)
The article Kidnap (2017 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kidnap (2017 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 07:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Brigsby Bear
 Schwede 66  12:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Mohanlal GA Review
, I think I've done everything as you mentioned above except #Filmography. But that section leads to two other main article. Have a look at those. --Shaji issac (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous
Hello:

Since you removed the GOCE tag before I was done and are now adding additional text, I am finished with any work I will do on the article. I will mark it completed on the GOCE request page.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Exigency
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Cinderella (2021 film).jpg
Hi ! You called my edit as possible vandalism stating the poster is "confirmed by IMPAwards and Deadline Hollywood". What was wrong in my edit? I also put up the reference for the new poster from the films official Twitter, as well as I stated that it "shows vast cast as seen in the pages of different Disney films Good Articles". You can check out Raya and the Last Dragon, Frozen II, Avengers: Endgame, etc. Please reply, thanks! M. Billoo 22:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean, I passed Raya and the Last Dragon and Frozen II as good articles. Either way, we use the official poster for a film article, which was recently confirmed to be the one I added. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Old Edit
,I think I've included citations as you suggests to show in Old (Shyamalan movie) article that some performances are receiving praise but you edited it out right after I included it in. Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by WardenBuffer (talk • contribs) 07:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (upcoming film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your GA review of Tomiris (film)
Hi. I would like to thank you for your effort and time you spent on reviewing Tomyris (film) for GA. Unfortunately, you decided that the article shoud be immediately failed, and subsequently, you provided several reasons why. However, WP:GAFAIL states that an article can, but by no means must, be failed without further review if, prior to the review: <ol> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol> In all other cases, the nominator deserves a full review against the six criteria from the reviewer. For most reviews, the nominator is given a chance to address any issues raised by the reviewer before the article is failed. I believe that it would've been better to put the review "on hold" as per WP:GANI to allow me and other interested editors to fix the issues you think prevent this article from being GA. I don't doubt your professionalism, but I think this article did not receive an adequate review, and therefore, I believe I should proceed with asking for additional input on the GA discussion page. Thank you once again and take care! -- Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire  06:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kate (film).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kate (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

I Knew You Were Trouble GAN
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. Thank you very much for reviewing the GANs of "State of Grace (song)" and "Red (Taylor Swift song)". I wonder if you could help out in reviewing the latest GAN of Taylor Swift's "I Knew You Were Trouble"? Thank you very much in advance, Ippantekina (talk) 04:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Palm Springs
I was thinking about editing Palm Springs (2020 film) a couple weeks ago as my possible first GA project, but I was immediately overwhelmed and didn't really know where to start. I see that you've started a rewrite, and I'm not going to ask you to stop for me. Just wondering if you have any advice on what to look for or where to begin when I eventually decide to tackle my first GA.  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 03:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you're rewriting an article, what I usually do first is create a list of sources and locate the most important ones. I am currently rewriting Palm Springs because I found a 1-hour-and-a-half podcast with its director and because The Hollywood Reporter wrote a making-of article. I then go by section (usually starting with the infobox, #Plot, #Production, #Release, and then #Reception) and do one-by-one to make sure it's consistent and not wordy. Finally, make sure you have reliable sources, which you can check by installing/entering this and this into your JavaScript page. I make sure to archive sources and add some free-to-use images to the article, but that's optional. Just remember that the most important thing is to find sources. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Army of the Dead
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina! I believe our paths have crossed quite a few times now, and it's nice to write(?) to you again! I have been impressed with your work and reviews on media and drama articles (and other articles too). I've put My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic up for peer review before hopefully nominating it for FA. If possible, I'd appreciate if you would be able to leave comments here. If you are unable to or just don't want to, that's totally understandable. Thanks either way! Pamzeis (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm kinda busy at the moment so expect some comments over the weekend. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hi. I just wanted to thank you for all of edits on "NDA" page. I'm not trying to be messy, but it doesn't go well yet, so thank you so much! infsai (dyskusja) 22:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

The Survivalist move
Hey, can you explain why you moved The Survivalist (upcoming film) to The Survivalist (2021 film) here? I don't see any sources that the film has a 2021 release date. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Same with Swing (upcoming film) to Swing (2021 film) . BOVINEBOY 2008 00:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * A release date was given for The Survivalist in its trailer. For The Swing, the 2021 date is mentioned in the article I cited which says it "is getting a fall theatrical platform release after a planned festival run." Also this. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Great! Would you mind taking the time to add that to the article? It might just be me, but it's always strange when I see a year in the article title but don't see it in the article anywhere! BOVINEBOY 2008
 * Thanks, I'll work on that. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Tomiris (film)
Hi. How are you? I hope you are doing well and staying safe. I would like to request you humbly to re-visit Tomiris (film), the page you had previously assessed for GA and subsequently, made several very useful suggestions. I believe this page is now fully ready for your second review and has all what it takes to become a GA. Thank you in advance. Take care! -- Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire  12:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dead for a Dollar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dead for a Dollar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dead for a Dollar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 02:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alice in Borderland (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character development.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Argylle
Please do not criticize my editing practices in article edit summaries. It was 4 in the morning when I saw the source, so it’s nice I even added the information and moved the page in the first place. Rusted AutoParts 16:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Even so, you can still try to add a template. No one is rushing you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * It would seem you are. I woke up to your first ping. Like I’ve said prior I will do my best to make sure citations are filled out if I have the time to do so. Please don’t jab at me about it in edit summaries. Rusted AutoParts  20:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

No vandalism or disruptive editing intended
I have twice provided minor elaborations on the development and background of a series, and both have been reverted. I've provided citations and can provide more if necessary. I'm happy to discuss further if necessary but otherwise please include the changes. Thank you. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia can't accept a reference from WP:IMDB, sorry about that, but feel free to re-add the content with a reliable source. However, it has been established that the series is based on the second novel, The Brass Verdict, not the entire book series (make sure to check the reliable sources listed in #Development). Also, the phrase "created and executive produced by David E. Kelley and developed and executive produced by Ted Humphrey" sounds repetitive for the first sentence. This is why it is included and expanded on in the second paragraph. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Here is a link from Michael Connelly's website indicating that only the first season is based on The Brass Verdict. https://www.michaelconnelly.com/2021/01/11/announcement-the-lincoln-lawyer-tv-show-is-coming-to-netflix/. The series will be based on all of the books.
 * A second season has not been announced. The website says that the first season is based on The Brass Verdict. The first season is currently the entire series, so it is correct to say the series is based on The Brass Verdict. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Also I am confused - where is it "included and expanded upon in the second paragraph?" The entire article has simply reverted to what it was before. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:06, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Ted Humphrey, Connelly, and Ross Fineman also executive produce, with Humphrey serving as showrunner for the first season. None of the sources listed in the article mention that Ted Humphrey is credited as a developer, so I didn't mention it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

"The first season is currently the entire series, so it is correct to say the series is based on The Brass Verdict." If that's the case, isn't it correct to say Humphrey serves as showrunner, rather than showunner "for the first season." Seems to be a case of having it both ways. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:18, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated. I will provide further citations for the rest. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

'Salem's Lot (film)
Hi, could I kindly ask why 'Salem's Lot (film) wasn’t just moved into mainspace from the draft I had preprared? Thanks.
 * I didn't see the draft until after it was created. However, when I redirected it, I noticed that the draft had some errors in its infobox, lead, and didn't follow MOS:BODY. The current article now has more info than the draft so no content was able to be moved. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Even with the errors in the draft, the article shouldn’t be in the mainspace yet, as the film has not begun filming and is not expected to until September. I’ve restored the draft and I’m suggesting we move forward with improving the draft further until filming begins per WP:CRYSTAL.
 * This is incorrect. The Hollywood Reporter that filming has begun in Boston. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. My mistake. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I suggest we improve the existing draft until filming begins. (Forgot to sign the previous messages sorry). KaitoNkmra23   (talk!)  01:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looking forward to be working together. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * As am I. Thanks again.  KaitoNkmra23   (talk!)  01:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

"'Salem's Lot (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect &. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. KaitoNkmra23  (talk!)  07:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I listed 'Salem's Lot (film) on Redirects for discussion as I’m unsure if there’s a method to move an article from draft to mainspace whilst keeping the edit history if there is a redirect obstructing the page move. I’m fairly new to this process so please let me know if there is another method, or I’ve done anything wrong and/or if I’m being misinformed. Thanks again. KaitoNkmra23   (talk!)  07:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

WP:TRAILER
Hey! I just noticed this edit and although I'm neutral on the situation I did notice that WP:TRAILER is part of MOS:FILM which technically only applies to films while MOS:TV doesn't explicitly state any information on trailers. I'll typically note the release date of a trailer in a marketing or release/broadcast section at times but as I said I'm neutral on whether or not it's there and am more likely to add it for consistency reasons. It may require a wider community discussion whether the information is useful or not. Just thought I'd bring it to someone's attention cause starting this discussion isn't specifically on the top of my to-do list currently. The Doctor Who (talk) 02:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alice in Borderland soundtrack cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alice in Borderland soundtrack cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

WP:OVERLINK vs WP:DUPLINK
Hi, just letting you know that WP:OVERLINK refers to things that shouldn't be linked at all since they're generally understandable, like countries, major cities, common words etc. The policy for repeated links is WP:DUPLINK. Thanks. IronManCap (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. Will keep this in mind. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)