User talk:Filmonline111

SON OF SARDAAR
Hello,you seem to be in little hurry while doing editting.Why are you delete the tag again if you did it before.You should not make decisions with yourself.Discuss it first and assume good faith.At first ,you may watch to what extent the article will go then you create new one if some more users agree.Thanks ---zeeyanketu  talk to me 05:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest you to merge it in the main article space then you are welcome to create new section if needed.There is no benefit in edit warring.So,please cooperate. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 05:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Another user has suggested that the table of reviews you have added to Son of Sardaar is not accurate, and is copied from another article. My searches indicate that the table does indeed bear a remarkable resemblance to one in another article, which could lead others to be doubtful about your editing. It is essential that you provide reliable sources to show that the content you have added is valid. It should not be difficult to do this, as you need do no more than say what the sources were where you got the information about the reviews you refer to. Can you please say where you got the information? When you have done that we will be able to make it clear to the editor who has questioned your edits that you are in fact right. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, I notice that one of your edit summaries refers to "edit warring", so you are clearly aware of the concept. I don't know, however, whether you are aware that edit warring can lead to being blocked from editing. (Note that such a block does not depend on whether the editing in question was "right" or "wrong": either way, persistent edit warring leads to being blocked.) JamesBWatson (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * this user is again adding the fake table. stop him John, please. He added the table, took out some nonexistent reviews but fudged the numbers so the ratings are 4s instead of the actual 1.5s and 2s. Why is he doing this? Ashermadan (talk) 09:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I note the following facts:
 * 1) You have again posted a list, albeit smaller, of supposed reviews.
 * 2) You have still not said where you got your information, either here, in the article, or anywhere else as far as I can see.
 * 3) Some of the information you have now posted directly contradicts information you had previously posted repeatedly, continuing even though others questioned that content.
 * 4) Wikipedia policy is that all content which is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by reliable sources, and that it must not be reposted without such sources.
 * Consequently I must ask you to either provided reliable sources for the disputed content or else remove it. It cannot possibly be difficult to provide sources: all you have to do is say where you got the information from, unless, of course, you didn't get it from anywhere, but made it up. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:28, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent abuse of multiple accounts, evading blocks on several accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ashwni Dhir, Filmonline111!

Wikipedia editor Spartaz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please don't copy paste text directly into articles as this creates a breach of our copyright rules."

To reply, leave a comment on Spartaz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.