User talk:Filmrd

Catamount, A North Country Thriller
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Catamount, A North Country Thriller, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.beechriverbooks.com/Rick_Davidson.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

How can I be accused of copy write infringement when I am the one who wrote the book and the blurb that is on Beech River Books and on my website? --Filmrd (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Rick Davidson
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rick Davidson, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.beechriverbooks.com/id16.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Catamount, A North Country Thriller
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Catamount, A North Country Thriller, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Catamount, A North Country Thriller appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Catamount, A North Country Thriller has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Catamount, A North Country Thriller and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Catamount, A North Country Thriller with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Catamount, A North Country Thriller.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. – Sadalmelik ☎ 19:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Same problem also with Rick Davidson - we can only use content from other sites under very strict criteria: they have to use a license compatible with GFDL (the one Wikipedia is using). Leave me a note on my talk page if you have any questions on this. – Sadalmelik ☎ 19:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I wrote the book, and the blurb that is on the back of the book and on my website, so how can I be accused of plagiarism? Please explain how this can happen.--Filmrd (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rick Davidson
A tag has been placed on Rick Davidson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Catamount, A North Country Thriller
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Catamount, A North Country Thriller, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... disco spinster   talk  21:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

If an author writes a book, the blurb on the back cover and also his blog, how can he be accused of plagiarism--Filmrd (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)? Please explain your policies to me.