User talk:Filthy

Note
Hi, please do not re-create deleted content such as Poizon Green. It will just again be deleted. Mi kk er (...) 08:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

?????!!
Why that would be deleted? I opened a new one and it didn't contain information like the previous one. It's like total new topic. What's wrong with it??! Filthy 00:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's simple. Poizon green is simply not a notable enough band to include on Wikipedia. See WP:MUSIC. Cheers, Mi kk er (...) 12:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * what?? there are many smaller bands than Poizon Green, LIVING in Wikipedia. What do you say about that??? Filthy 17:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Erm... if you disagree take Poizon Green to deletion review. It has been AFD-ed twice, each time the consensus was to delete. Oh, and please send me the names of the "smaller bands than Poizon Green, LIVING in Wikipedia" so they can be deleted. Mi kk er (...) 09:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Filthy/Poizon Green
I have added a "" template to the article User:Filthy/Poizon Green, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Calton | Talk 23:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)