User talk:FinTechFuture

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuturePay (September 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FuturePay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuturePay Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:FuturePay reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Username and COI
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "FuturePay", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent an entity with which you're associated, and raises conflict of interest concerns, per WP:COI. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

WP:SOAP is relevant here, too. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:FuturePay


A tag has been placed on Draft:FuturePay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * See WP:CORP for relevant guidelines and WP:RS for more information about what constitutes a good source (e.g., independent vs press release, in-depth coverage versus a passing mention, etc). OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * First of all, only one unblock request at a time please. Generally speaking, an article would need at least three third-party reliable sources with non-trivial coverage to easily pass notability checks. Currently, I see one that would probably count toward a non-trivial RS, and one that would not, in that it only gives a passing mention to the company. I'd also suggest agreeing to go through the WP:AFC process versus creating the article yourself. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 21:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Whoops, I thought I was supposed to create a new "unblock" section each time I made an update. And yes I am willing to also agree to go through the AFC process, the article wizard is quite a helpful tool

Help me!
Please help me with... Ensuring my sources are independent, reliable, and verifiable. I am not certain about the quality of these sources and would like some feedback if they are good enough to be used to write a new wiki article: http://shoppingkim.com/online-stores-that-accept-futurepay-to-buy-now-pay-later/ https://www.optimum7.com/internet-marketing/programming-2/futurepay-integration-with-volusion-bigcommerce-and-shopify-selling-expensive-products-online.html http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/futurepay-integrates-with-commerce-guys-providing-new-payment-method-for-over-30000-online-retailers-using-drupal-commerce-513526321.html http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/futurepay-integrates-with-commerce-guys-providing-new-payment-method-for-over-30000-online-retailers-using-drupal-commerce-239246101.html

FinTechFuture (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC) None of those would help: OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Shoppingkim Non-notable blog. With a few exceptions, blogs do not meet WP:RS
 * Optimum7 No; testimonial from non-notable marketing company
 * Press release No
 * Press release No