User talk:FinalForm

Welcome!
Hello, FinalForm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 01:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Alert regarding
Neutralitytalk 01:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Justine Kish
What part of "Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives" did you not understand? Just because something can be sourced does not qualify it for inclusion, especially when it is a source of continual puerile vandalism meant to humiliate the subject. It is sufficient to state that she lost the contest without going into details. The event that you insist is notable enough to be prominently displayed in a person's encyclopedia biography is a common problem in extreme sports, most notably in distance running, and is not appropriate for inclusion in this case, where it has been used by others to denigrate the subject. Your edit on the talkpage, however well-intentioned compared to the gross vandalism that prevailed in the article, was a violation of the BLP policy, which applies on all parts of Wikipedia, and has been redacted. It was not vandalism, it was a breach of policy.  Acroterion   (talk)   09:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

draw
"X drew Y" is not "fine", it is grammatically incorrect, unless you mean "X was paired with Y". "X drew with Y" or "X drew against Y" are correct. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)