User talk:FindingTruth01

July 2018
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kevin Sabet— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

The content added in “controversy” is false, clearly biased, and should not be on someone’s personal Wikipedia page. It is heinous that Wikipedia allows cyber bullying and harassment here and that should stop. FindingTruth01 (talk) 15:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

It is constructive
The content added in “controversy” is false and clearly has a bias. Such info should not be on someone’s personal Wikipedia page. FindingTruth01 (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aspening. I noticed that in this edit to Kevin Sabet, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Removal of cited content
Just because something is unflattering does not mean that it should be deleted. What was removed from the article Kevin Sabet appears cited to me. Aspening (talk) 02:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kevin Sabet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Read the transcript of the event being (incorrectly) described. You’re not even reading the source. The whole section is incorrect. Thanks FindingTruth01 (talk) 02:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

See quote from transcript: “I brought some props.” So the entire section is a farce. Reporting me won’t stop the truth from being represented on this page. FindingTruth01 (talk) 02:37, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kevin Sabet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 11:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)