User talk:Findingcarterfanatic

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

A Dark Conscience (Film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of A Dark Conscience (Film), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: A dark conscience. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Dark Conscience (Film)


The article A Dark Conscience (Film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG/WP:CRYSTAL with no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Dark Conscience (Film)


A tag has been placed on A Dark Conscience (Film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Notability and films
Hi! I thought I'd explain a little as to why the page was deleted. Ultimately it all boils down to notability, as the film has not yet received any coverage in independent and reliable sources. On Wikipedia this would mean things like newspaper coverage or reviews in websites like We Got This Covered or Twitch Film. Most films will not gain the needed amount of coverage until the film releases and starts gaining those reviews, especially independently released films.

The only sources you had in the article was IMDb and a self-published Weebly post. Neither of these can show notability. They can show that the film exists in some format, but existing by itself is not notability on Wikipedia. You can read an explanation as to why IMDb is not usable as a reliable source at WP:RS/IMDB. The Weebly site would be seen as a WP:PRIMARY source because it was written by the people who made the film, however even if it was not it would still be considered a self-published source per WP:SPS.

However that said, I do hope that you keep writing about the film somewhere, but right now it's just not really appropriate for Wikipedia. I get the impression that you're likely one of the people involved with the film, so I can give you a few recommendations of sites to hit up for coverage. You definitely want to check out Ain't It Cool News since they are considered a reliable source at this point in time and they do cover independent films. HorrorNews.net and Dread Central are both good places to start as well. You might also want to look into starting your own wiki on Wikia. While that couldn't be used as a source here on Wikipedia, it is a good place to start practicing writing and it can help attract some attention. It's also a good place to cover the various aspects of the filmmaking process. On a side note, you might also want to talk to your local paper. Local sources can sometimes be depreciated on Wikipedia but by large they're still considered to be usable on here - and a lot of local papers like covering stuff like this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Findingcarterfanatic, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure