User talk:Fingers2424


 * Notice: you are now blocked DIRECTLY, rather than just having been caught in an autoblock. Please read WP:SOCK - you are permitted one account on Wikipedia, and all others can be blocked on sight.  If you have been previously blocked for edit-warring, the you need to realize that we work on WP:CONSENSUS.  We have a clear be bold, revert, then discuss policy.  Finally, the continued use of the word "libel" may be considered to have a violation of the no legal threats policy, and can also lead to blocks.  Go back to your FIRST and what should be ONLY account, read WP:GAB and the policies I linked above, and act accordingly. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

You have only confirmed the utter uselessness of this site. I spoke honestly, because I acted justifiably in order to remove libel. But apparently, Wikipedia does not place the truth higher than petty technicalities. Also, I was not warned before I was blocked. I had no idea why I would be blocked until it happened. I don't keep up on Wikipedia rules because they are mostly useless. Wikipedia allows people to cite just about anything as truth, which is appalling. And clearly, the "administrators" have no shame, and it's probably because it's the only joy you get while couch surfing or living in someone's basement.Fingers2424 (talk) 03:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I request to be unblocked because I was unaware of Wikipedia policies. I intended no malice, all I intended to do was remove libelous information on the JaMarcus Russell page and became over-zealous in doing so.

I was unaware that I could not use multiple accounts, because after all, Wikipedia allowed me to do so. I do not understand why Wikipedia would allow the creation of multiple accounts, yet have policies against doing so.

Seeing as how, I was unaware of Wikipedia policies, I will willingly cooperate in order to rectify the issue. I would like to keep the user name Fingers2424, while Wikipedia can delete yoyoyo4567. Moreover, silverandblack is not mine, but that of a friend whom was on the same wireless network.

That was a joke protected by free speech. I apologize for that though. Moreover, I disagree. I was not aware before this that I could not have multiple accounts.10:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

The Block is Excessive / Should be given a finite length

 * I also will point out that if this account is the same person as Silverandblack, all unblock requests should be made from that account. —DoRD (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Biased distrust that seems retaliatory

 * A few more notes:
 * You request still doesn't reflect that you understand why you have been blocked in the first place. Blocking is preventative, not punitive. An unblock doesn't require apologies, it requires that the user understands why he has been blocked. It seems that you still do not understand the reason for your block.
 * All your unblock requests (This one included) mainly attack other people instead of discussing yourself. "Your friend did it", "you're quite cynical", "Biased distrust that seems retaliatory", "Unjustified punishment", "my intent was not malicious and yet Wikipedia continues to ignore that.". An unblock request is about you and your actions, not about others. This only reinforces my first concern - you simply don't seem to understand why you have been blocked, which means that you would likely make the same mistake again. And therefor the block will not be lifted.
 * Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and not a court room where you can plead innocence due to not having been served "A document with a signature" explaining the rules to you. Neither is Wikipedia a Battleground or a democracy. If you maintain your current combative method of approaching problems, rather then trying to understand the other side and working towards the middle, i predict that Wikipedia will not be a place you would like to stay.


 * I also see that Redvers has revoked your talk page editing rights for repeated abuse of the unblock template. Once you understand why you have been blocked you may issue another request trough the mailing list, but with your current behavior i don't see even a remote chance that you will be unblocked. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 14:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)