User talk:Finiteman1

Proposed deletion of Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability in third-party sources; can easily be covered in the Unviersity's article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The same issue has been raised with respect to Simon Fraser University's East Gymnasium and Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also McKinnon Gym and Envision Athletic Centre. Topics of Wikipedia articles should be notable in and of themselves; a building that is part of a university is not necessarily notable as an independent topic, even if the university itself is notable.  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of McKinnon Gym
I have nominated McKinnon Gym, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/McKinnon Gym. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Finiteman1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Fred Besana -

AfD nomination of New United States Football League
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is New United States Football League. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/New United States Football League. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Fraser University's East Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Fraser University's East Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's East Gymnasium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's West Gymnasium & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1997 CIAU Football All-Canadian Team


The article 1997 CIAU Football All-Canadian Team has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Simply a list of players, obscure and tagged for notability since 2009"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)