User talk:FinnHK

Removal of SEC Section
Hi Finn,

I already placed the Information "Regarding SEC under Business Section". SO I am removing what you have placed. Please don't revert back the content again. The content which I am placing is 100% correct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziad_K._Abdelnour — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajmavrick (talk • contribs) 06:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Ziad Abdelnour
Hi,

Finn recently I have made changes to the page 'Ziad K. Abdelnour' can you please take a look at the content once and the resources which I have provided whether they meet "notability guideline for biographies". Rajmavrick (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. I agree completely with what you say - wikipedia should be neutral and accurate. Thanks for your help. Regards Denisarona (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Finn

This is regarding the "Third Opinion" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Third_opinion for our discussion on SEC's statements. I am ready to have the "3O' for SEC Wordings...Rajmavrick (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tour of Alberta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Lelu Island (British Columbia)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Lelu Island (British Columbia), FinnHK!

Wikipedia editor GeoffreyT2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Article is dead end. Please consider adding links in the article."

To reply, leave a comment on GeoffreyT2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michel Siffre


The article Michel Siffre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject lacks notability and article reads like a puff piece

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Okay kaya


The article Okay kaya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 02:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Okay Kaya


A tag has been placed on Okay Kaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 17:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Kevin O'Leary net worth
Hi, I saw your old comment about Kevin O'Leary's likely erroneous listed net worth on his page and wanted to let you know that I marked it as a potentially unreliable source and opened a discussion on the talk page. I haven't found that the reliability of this information has improved in the 3 years since you made your comment, and agree with your analysis of where the number actually falls based on publicly available information. Midnight whisper (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)