User talk:FinnsDeal

Welcome!

Hello, FinnsDeal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Odiabot (talk) 04:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style
 * Thank you so much Odiabot for giving me a warm welcome here. I will do my best to contribute to the articles here and will definitely be sure to check out my account every now and then. We're all against vandalisms and it's what I am going to avoid, and to fight. I will "clean" the articles containing vandalisms, or reports that did not indicate any sources but comes in a suspicious tone. You know what I mean. Again, a lot of thanks. FinnsDeal (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Countdown
Hi. How did you know about this? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 16:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for putting my own comments in that article. Now that the video is released, I think there's nothing more to ask. It's just awesome! And I'm glad I saw your comment on her website. What a dedicated fan! She's gotta be proud of you. Have you seen "Love On Top" already? FinnsDeal (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Awww thanks so much. So were you the one to whom i replied there? Yes, i love her a lot. I cannot say how much. Lol. Yes, i saw the preview and i like it. Beyonce looks beautiful, like in the DIL era but the preview looked like a rehearsal. Are you also a big fan? If yes, you can join this. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 17:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope, I didn't sign up on her site. Lost my account's password and I haven't got the chance to create a new one. This era's music videos may be low-budgeted and simple, but look how much she wows the critics! It has quality, and her videos doesn't need such gimmicks (talk about Rihanna and Lady Gaga) just to show how much a legend she is now. I mean, it's the music that matters anyway! I'm a big fan since I was in my elementary years! Hehe, sounds great anyways. I was sad when I saw on your page that you're retired and won't be posting anything until December 2011, so this message's a surprise. FinnsDeal (talk) 08:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Awww you do not have to be sad. Lol. I would have come back. Actually, i had to come today because of this. I am very happy to know that you are such a big fan. But why don't you edit her articles more frequently. I see, through your contributions that most of the time, you do not edit music-related articles. If you ever need help, do let me know. I am always happy to help those who care fro Beyonce. Concerning the legend status of Ms. Knowles, i totally agree but there are many here that will simply not agree. Well they cannot be blamed. Not everyone recognizes true talent especially when their faves are... I prefer not to tell it to avoid a huge wave of arguments. Did you see my talk-page. I just told "You better show her some respect because your own fave is a STAN.". Lol. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 08:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with it all! Do you think Beyoncé plagiarized Anne's work? I think she was just inspired to do the same thing. I don't see anything wrong with that. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that there'll be no lawsuits, whatsoever. I don't want "Countdown" to be banned or be removed from her (upcoming or rumored) video anthology. About my edits, I keep my music-related posts minimal. It changes so fast, and I can't keep up with the sources. I only reconstruct sentences when needed, or add missing information. Hehe. Sorry for the short reply, I'm on my way to school! Chat later. BTW, do you really think she faked her pregnancy? FinnsDeal (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Some tips to help you out!
Hi, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps.  Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type  on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 09:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837.

Chzz lives in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!
Hi there ! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing!  Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 09:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Google Chrome complete version history


A tag has been placed on Google Chrome complete version history requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 09:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't believe any of my contributions infriged one's copyright. I tried re-phrasing most of the texts found on my references, if possible. And I did use my own words. On the other hand, the page was redirected to Google Chrome already, so I guess it's settled then. FinnsDeal (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Google Chrome complete version history for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Google Chrome complete version history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Google Chrome complete version history until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yoenit (talk) 10:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article is now redirected to a section in Google Chrome. I am glad to contribute to the site, but I wish I have completed the whole article. Time did not allow me, but now I've learned my lesson. FinnsDeal (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season

 * Thank you so much Jivesh, I did appreciate the effort! Keep doing what you do best, especially the Beyoncé Knowles-related articles. Have yourself a merry little Christmas and have a happy New Year! Enjoy the festive season. FinnsDeal (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You are welcome and thanks. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And because it's the season of sharing, I would like to reveal something. I signed up on ATRL over a month ago, and has been silently participating in threads under the BeyoncéFlicks name. FinnsDeal (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I suspected that. I like the drama there. And those stan fights. So ridiculous but funny. I am Sasha Fierce. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The way I construct my sentences, that is. I'm really not doing anything on the site just yet. I just like browsing each page to see what else is new, but most of the time, like what you said, they fight (especially on "I Care" vs. "End of Time," two great tracks). Now I guess they're fighting over Beyoncé's success whether it is built by Mathew or not. Any upcoming articles on Wikipedia? FinnsDeal (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's so true. I feel like beating some of them. Lol. Yes, I have created articles for every song on 4 recently except "Lay Up Under Me". Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 10:22, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that Korea's downloading songs from 4 and it's charting, so there's a reason to create an article without the administrators deleting it. Anyways, is there a possibility that "Lay Up Under Me" will get its article treatment soon? FinnsDeal (talk) 10:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It reached number one in Korea. I am happy for the treatment the songs are getting there. But there is not enough information for composition and critical reception. So, it will be difficult. Are you from Korea? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 10:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not from Korea. I just noticed the chart positions on your articles. FinnsDeal (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol. From where are you then? I am from Mauritius. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 10:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

April 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 04:43, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * As a non-new editor, you should know better than that.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ray William Johnson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=496454152 here]. Mdann52 (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:FinnsDeal/sandbox
User:FinnsDeal/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FinnsDeal/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:FinnsDeal/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jac 16888 Talk 23:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cunnilingus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cunnilingus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

April 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beyoncé. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. ''It's one thing for an IP to come to Wikipedia and brandish a BLP intro with hateful comments ("credits thief", "neofeminazi", "man-hat[er]", etc.), but it's another to see a user with an account, and someone who (previously?) held themselves out to be a fan of the BLP in question, abuse the page in this way and mask it via the edit summary. I hope that if you return to WP, your edits are constructive and not destructive. Thanks. —JennKR'' | ☎ 22:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Wan, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * But James Wan is really ugly and is Asian. FinnsDeal (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Third-wave febulism


A tag has been placed on Third-wave febulism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peter James (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Lives Matter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Majora (talk) 22:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Black Lives Matter, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Black Lives Matter, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of The Simpsons episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Katniss  May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  13:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Simpsons episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Katniss  May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  23:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of The Simpsons episodes, you may be blocked from editing.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 09:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Septrillion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to No Good Read Goes Unpunished— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Septrillion (talk) 23:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Problem with Apu, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 05:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Courcelles (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * You've made stuff up, you've denigrated BLP's, and then you vandalized AIV. I've seen more clear cut cases of WP:NOTHERE, but I've no doubt in my mind that you fit the document well. Courcelles (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)