User talk:Finofin23

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Midnight Sky, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I appreciate how kindly you’ve told me this but could you tell me what exactly have I edited that has been disruptive? Thank you Finofin23 (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * You added (and tried to reinstate) an assessment of reviews that wasn't adequately substantiated. One cannot simply make presumptions about reception solely based on the sheer number of favorable/mixed/unfavorable comments already shown in Wikipedia articles. Doing so goes against WP:SYNTH (linked above), might neglect to factor in remarks that haven't already been inserted, and can come off as lazy. It's best to find references specifically mentioning how a piece was received, and implement those when possible. SNUGGUMS (talk / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 22:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at House on Fire (Mimi Webb song). Muhandes (talk) 23:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Şımarık, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ResPM (T&#x1F508;&#x1F3B5;C) 10:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

WP:Non-free content criteria
Please read the above page. Per the 8th criterion listed, non-free images (which includes screenshots of copyrighted works) must provide something that enhances reader's understanding of a topic. One can't just simply add any picture just because one likes how it looks. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a place for mere decoration. An informative caption for such images should be included to give helpful context whenever we do add screenshots. If you have questions on how to give adequate captions, then feel free to ask. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 11:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Sophie Anderson
Please remove the addition of 1 children you added to this page. There is no evidence given on the page of this. Without evidence it shouldn't be included. 2A00:23C6:E884:2A01:3C7D:1B90:50B3:E7A9 (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at So Good (Rachel Stevens song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''WP:OVER200. I so very clearly put that in my edit summary.'' ResPM  (T&#x1F508;&#x1F3B5;C) 19:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.