User talk:Fionnaredhead

Katie Rowley Jones
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Katie Rowley Jones, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.actuallyactors.com/katierowleyjones/career.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Your addition to Katie Rowley Jones has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Rd232 talk 17:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Katie Rowley Jones
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Katie Rowley Jones, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.actuallyactors.com/katierowleyjones/career.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Katie Rowley Jones. Dr Dec (Talk)   17:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Harsh - Fiona had just removed the copyvio bit. You do see the need to write in your own words now, don't you Fiona? See WP:COPYPASTE. Rd232 talk 17:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Katie Rowley Jones


A tag has been placed on Katie Rowley Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 02:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion declined. However the article may still be deleted by other means - it needs to be expanded to make that less likely. Rd232 talk 09:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Katie Rowley Jones


The article Katie Rowley Jones has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, reivews are mentions only

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Fionna: The deletion proposal is based on notability concerns. If you disagree with deletion, just remove the tag from the article. Rd232 talk 12:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Katie Rowley Jones
I have nominated Katie Rowley Jones, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Katie Rowley Jones. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)