User talk:Fire Water

Martin Bishop
Martin Bishop has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Martin Bishop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Martin Bishop is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Martin Bishop. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. - Peripitus (Talk) 13:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Not here thanks
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jameson Booker. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Peripitus (Talk) 13:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)