User talk:Firebirdbrother

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pokeno game was changed by Firebirdbrother (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953408 on 2013-01-15T15:30:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WEKS. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: WEKS was changed by Firebirdbrother (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95208 on 2013-01-15T18:50:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chiricahua National Forest was changed by Firebirdbrother (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959167 on 2013-02-11T20:24:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chiricahua National Forest with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 20:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Adrian Peterson, you may be blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Crazy Gang has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Crazy Gang was changed by Firebirdbrother (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952525 on 2014-01-16T17:18:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "LINDSEY"
A page you created, LINDSEY, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as you will be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Anthony


A tag has been placed on Jacob Anthony requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jprg1966  (talk)  17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:IronGargoyle with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)